re: Last Call: Use of ISO CLNP in TUBA Environments to Proposed Standard

Craig Partridge <craig@aland.bbn.com> Tue, 27 July 1993 21:14 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11494; 27 Jul 93 17:14 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11489; 27 Jul 93 17:14 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03513; 27 Jul 93 17:14 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11477; 27 Jul 93 17:14 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11473; 27 Jul 93 17:14 EDT
Received: from uu2.psi.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03507; 27 Jul 93 17:14 EDT
Received: from port13.sunnyvale.ca.pub-ip.psi.net by uu2.psi.com (5.65b/4.0.071791-PSI/PSINet) via SMTP; id AA25050 for IESG@cnri.reston.va.us; Tue, 27 Jul 93 17:14:54 -0400
Received: by aland.bbn.com (4.1/3.1.090690-BBN) id AA06564; Tue, 27 Jul 93 14:13:26 PDT
Message-Id: <9307272113.AA06564@aland.bbn.com>
To: IESG <IESG@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Cc: ietf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Cc: tuba@lanl.gov
Subject: re: Last Call: Use of ISO CLNP in TUBA Environments to Proposed Standard
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Craig Partridge <craig@aland.bbn.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1993 14:13:25 -0700
X-Orig-Sender: craig@aland.bbn.com

> The IESG has received a request from the TCP/UDP over CLNP-addressed
> Networks Working Group to consider <draft-ietf-tuba-clnp-03.txt> "Use
> of ISO CLNP in TUBA Environments" for the status of Proposed Standard.
 
Hi:

    I believe that standardizing (or putting into the standards track)
any of the IPtng proposals before we've decided which one we are likely
to pick is to revive the CMOT/SNMP/HEMS competing standards migraine.

    Given that the various BOFs on IP criteria are still having trouble
determining what the right IPtng goals are, how can we possibly think of
putting one of the proposals on the standards track?

Craig