Last Call: Use of ISO CLNP in TUBA Environments to Proposed
"Harold C. Folts" <foltsh@cc.ims.disa.mil> Wed, 28 July 1993 16:18 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07951; 28 Jul 93 12:18 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07947; 28 Jul 93 12:18 EDT
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18826; 28 Jul 93 12:18 EDT
Received: from noc-gw.lanl.gov by mailhost.lanl.gov (5.65/%I%) id AA00959; Wed, 28 Jul 93 10:01:47 -0600
Received: by noc-gw.lanl.gov (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA18019; Wed, 28 Jul 93 10:01:32 MDT
Return-Path: <foltsh@CC.ims.disa.mil>
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov by noc-gw.lanl.gov (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA18013; Wed, 28 Jul 93 10:01:31 MDT
Received: from birch.ims.disa.mil by mailhost.lanl.gov (5.65/%I%) id AA18360; Wed, 28 Jul 93 06:29:39 -0600
Received: from funnel.ims.disa.mil by birch.ims.disa.mil.ims.disa.mil (4.1/RAB-5.0) id AA08687; Wed, 28 Jul 93 08:29:50 EDT
Received: from CC.IMS.DISA.MIL by funnel.ims.disa.mil (4.1/RB&BK-4.1.5) id AA25525; Wed, 28 Jul 93 08:29:04 EDT
Received: from ccMail by CC.IMS.DISA.MIL id AA743873327 Wed, 28 Jul 93 08:28:47 EST
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1993 08:28:47 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Harold C. Folts" <foltsh@cc.ims.disa.mil>
Message-Id: <9306287438.AA743873327@CC.IMS.DISA.MIL>
To: IETF-Announce.@cc.ims.disa.mil, IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>, tuba@lanl.gov
MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Cc: IESG@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Last Call: Use of ISO CLNP in TUBA Environments to Proposed
>The IESG has received a request from the TCP/UDP over CLNP-addressed >Networks Working Group to consider <draft-ietf-tuba-clnp-03.txt> "Use >of ISO CLNP in TUBA Environments" for the status of Proposed Standard. ************************************* I have been following with interest all the chatter going on since the above announcement. I have been led to the understand that the SPIRIT of the Internet process was to accept technically viable, properly qualified proposals as Internet standards and let the market place take it from there. TUBA has solidly met these conditions with substantial support. Political bickering should not muddy the process. THE DISCUSSIONS ARE STARTING TO SOUND LIKE A STANDARDS COMMITTEE. Let's get on with the TUBA standards proposal. Hal
- Last Call: Use of ISO CLNP in TUBA Environments t… Harold C. Folts