[Tvr] Gorry Fairhurst's No Objection on draft-ietf-tvr-requirements-10: (with COMMENT)

[Gorry Fairhurst via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Gorry Fairhurst has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tvr-requirements-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tvr-requirements/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Thank you for the TSV-ART review by Mirja Kühlewind, and the issues raised in
that review.

Minor: Section 1:
/This document is an informational specification meant to inform .../ -- is it
better to state: /This document was written to inform.../

Minor:
/orchestrator/ - ought this to be /Orchestrator/

Minor:
Why does an International document discuss GPS, whilst coordinated Universal
Time (UTC) is a primary time standard?

Minor:
Is a "MAC address" sufficient in Layer 2? - Does this document need to consider
a wider set, i.e. EUI-48, or EUI-64?

Thank you for addressing my discussion topics in draft-ietf-tvr-requirements-10.

Gorry