Re: [GNAP] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-gnap-core-protocol-18: (with DISCUSS)

[Francesca Palombini <[e-mail]>]

Hi Justin, authors,

Thank you for this update.

Please don’t forget to send a review request (see https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/media-types/EyDmGmlDG9PImdaHIdzp7hYiC8c/ for an example) to the media-types mailing list. As specified by RFC6838, it is strongly encouraged to post the media type registration to the media-types mailing list for review. I think giving a week for people to look over would be good, and with no objections the DISCUSS can be removed and the doc approved before the GNAP meeting on Wednesday.

Francesca

From: Justin Richer <[e-mail]>
Date: Friday, 8 March 2024 at 17:47
To: Orie Steele <[e-mail]>
Cc: Francesca Palombini <[e-mail]>, The IESG <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-gnap-core-protocol-18: (with DISCUSS)
The editors have added this requested change here.

https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-core-protocol/pull/533<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454445555731-685670a300b88e25&q=1&e=ac862216-2609-40ae-ad96-214ff8033898&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fietf-wg-gnap%2Fgnap-core-protocol%2Fpull%2F533>

— Justin


On Mar 7, 2024, at 10:53 AM, Justin Richer <[e-mail]> wrote:

Good catch, we can easily add those to the IANA section. Thanks!

— Justin


On Mar 7, 2024, at 10:30 AM, Orie Steele <[e-mail]> wrote:

Adding sections similar to 13.2 and 13.3 in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt-08#section-13.2

Would clear my DISCUSS, assuming I end up holding it after IETF 119.

OS

On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 9:16 AM Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-gnap-core-protocol-18: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-gnap-core-protocol/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work on this document.

Holding a DISCUSS for Orie Steele (incoming ART AD) who caught this:

DISCUSS:

This document appears to required registered media types of the form:

application/gnap-binding+jwsd
application/gnap-binding-rotation+jwsd

These are inline with the JWT BCP:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8725#name-use-explicit-typing

However, they are not currently requested for registration, as either
standalone media types, or as Structured Syntax Suffixes.

I believe this can easily be addressed, by requesting registrations in the
appropriate iana registries:

- https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml
-
https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-type-structured-suffix/media-type-structured-suffix.xhtml






--

ORIE STEELE
Chief Technology Officer
www.transmute.industries<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454445555731-a7ff2eb208872658&q=1&e=ac862216-2609-40ae-ad96-214ff8033898&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.transmute.industries%2F>
[Image removed by sender.]<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454445555731-833883293856debb&q=1&e=ac862216-2609-40ae-ad96-214ff8033898&u=https%3A%2F%2Ftransmute.industries%2F>