[GNAP] draft-ietf-gnap-core-protocol-00

Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> Thu, 22 October 2020 23:15 UTC

Return-Path: <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2356B3A00D9 for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.027
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.027 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12=2.059, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O1X3EVY4Mxcn for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C2CE3A00C4 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id a5so3730298ljj.11 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=1ihoSUJ+OQ2gLKMPZ1vH52YqQ0WDUDcB9HcbLrZHrig=; b=vI1NbIg9que0hcQw8u2cFrmv17l/Kt/2go4a80Gfcei5oL61fhEQdhhmeenSvBkg4l 7w5ArxulfoSK0C07TeUBTmXhlEcu3w3arCakM9ODHsAt82Iz0UYUhYu6Fu4KolZlQq7a T+hKIY0JaeMoicxAZUaiEvp4IGOoMwYiY97AaoErcGLFsHwzS+5z+Q1tOS3ciF2sGlBP JpdJuSGXteGUogUulvPCeFHnj58KYuGgIvsELaLPePvbjK/wTshjmdcExW5d/mOKNzKl fzMGif81S22KrE/PbbjxyhKQMwbi0m2Kt4NhNfEn+Qk6557RLvvhjQp9CvAuOWKJzjWg 8UbQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=1ihoSUJ+OQ2gLKMPZ1vH52YqQ0WDUDcB9HcbLrZHrig=; b=dqXELnciQ5GlsWUPxWsvodJJCbECKq8t4Gws0GjsLov4IMYSv9FEG4gxwDixydIguD coNhlbYafbpA76K+Acrz2K1tsp4GjVj851KH1HYjNIJxA3fKBtSgUtFkUMpk+zjLQLty 0zKKp0sOXpDyIi2Qv2v/8tg6f6MGCkzYA/e5ZzVuKe5ptJXAWsMAt7xlvTuPYefyjVUH LueOpFRG+BPrxX9Vum/ZdpIH2Ya3L1vJW7t7BrJFJipGcsBDcn2cRbgjUFh3qZ2Zh5Vx Ar23EWg9PNRVe5oXlsfUWYjV5SBXqrgKS6zqhpnFccBHcHt1NoAGt4qG8Gyp5Ixt1cP7 69tQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+csVda8jif7tfEBKl1iNmD/dDlvuCp5M4tEDJ6UJ5DPcpukAO +NN35/cs0rVXml3Z+HXry9NZp/5nmyOk0yu3Xe8KpQAqkO0Uxw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwtx2VTQJgHSUE+8ZMQWOKVmshBVKzic/E1FpjSNlPYiX95DtrMIwvYWyQGgYLY9xjTNZBflSyzS1gYTe53cXY=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8853:: with SMTP id z19mr1824708ljj.142.1603408499628; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:14:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD9ie-ve0m85p6x5--pzvgjYLamoaEZnmaE3t93Hy-O7OsLvQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: GNAP Mailing List <txauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000cdd5605b24aa2a2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/AXEIGHbe75Xlt3j2j3qSidr-1Zs>
Subject: [GNAP] draft-ietf-gnap-core-protocol-00
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 23:15:04 -0000

I have heard that some people are uncertain about my view on the WG draft.
Although I was disappointed that the design team did not select the best
features from XYZ and XAuth[1], I do want us to move forward with what we
have if the WG was supportive of adoption, which it was.

I had hoped that the design team process would have been a forum for Justin
and I, with help from the other members, to align on design choices -- as
there are many nuances to those choices -- but now we will do that in the
WG!

/Dick

[1]
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/E8D1Id0QPUNxdRfSbeBOVECvn1c/