Re: [GNAP] Subject Identifiers draft - request for volunteers

Prachi Jain <> Tue, 01 March 2022 12:34 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8683A087B; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 04:34:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.856
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.856 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WSCF0ZjCmTrW; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 04:34:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E4423A0872; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 04:34:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id j2so26988654ybu.0; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 04:34:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bl7WuftBDC6OLYUf64TB5xNRdqxxvlKQzUss/HxIBHg=; b=XUnwPGX5m6fLde3LAt7V1NWLv+YlXWCnYdwE/iS5V1UZtyTFayduAPHcXJHYuHsJDL znO7GjXubZGUKymyIsc4l57atqfMj591yT1jTOhOIi2EJQGJNJH2Hdj1uEwZlqApMIER jS1CbF+Jk/iui+sEWoMNIVD5nOneptmPHbExhLUTMwV5N92BjMtf02mN6EL7lcGg6cbg UnO6yzqjsFvfpqo3Hr3+xjMyFEvAQEsppW5QFcqRd91h1UFwNsy3gLLXshv0F8MsbPKh 2o1QWdsW3ytEv2Aza2vigsWAn5pVQipG4QS5WYls7ooJn4vUEXFShBXOJnyKUOl2ZF5w PbfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bl7WuftBDC6OLYUf64TB5xNRdqxxvlKQzUss/HxIBHg=; b=UgprregK44PYSc4HGuZIQ0n+KlDVbUx6rAvPa4Baki+Clo7pebxNzj8GhrEiytES5/ 8jZPZG+jfHBNhlb8Y88C8CR7YF2xchzPFuZ9qoWjAhEm78UycgLwBGMPOoaix/+002MZ 7INMr3wz+bFpXsaQRiq/zQkQwkxov5l91JWcrEyWgwgQJkuWYev98pbrk8LWNDcqsgSM bb2DgB/RrTggBQBLpKRn9TxkOUH84DhtmTftZcr0hpBBwyH1UpDI3yJEYXOQWzKkA9fb 6j8pGPiQm3V3KZw1P1kzyJQVPmvGLpi3wx/yhc9itLGli8zkdgWNVt9nVIwI4xN0tqIc 97vg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533NDQDQKVzvqnVVFRPK24Yj9mcGN6lil3My/iQtFR/cc3OT68Mb AWlm/eKo6ebViC3SxiCqO78MM4fSO9Ol+1Gi3rHoa5G0
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQ6KZjZoJkUlprRbRrEXsqKTJlOTR+u954w/qHSUAL2T4Mut45Dz25VXujuA0RZaKNzVc+Wl1dn0qGIEZ12dA=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:2482:0:b0:622:72e1:5203 with SMTP id k124-20020a252482000000b0062272e15203mr22888401ybk.350.1646138066794; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 04:34:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Prachi Jain <>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 06:34:16 -0600
Message-ID: <>
To: Denis <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b8fea605d92762ea"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [GNAP] Subject Identifiers draft - request for volunteers
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNAP <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 12:34:30 -0000

Hi Denis,

Thank you for your email and raising these concerns.

I volunteered to take up this draft and drive it past the finish line along
with the other authors. I am in mid of identifying all the comments and
concerns that still need to be addressed after draft-09. I will take a look
at your review comments today and get back to you as soon as possible 😊


On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 5:38 AM Denis <> wrote:

> Hi Yaron,
> This WG is not really active any more. Apparently there is a lack of
> participation. Adding one or more editors is unlikely to solve the problem.
> The key question to be raised is how many people who are registered in the
> WG are still interested.
> A key point is to understand in which contexts this specification would be
> used.
> I have been one of the very few who has posted a message to this WG: my
> message was posted on 2021-05-27.
> It raises important concerns which are related to subject identifiers. It
> proposes solutions to address them.
> I would appreciate to have a technical discussion about it, but if no one
> is still interested in this work item, this is unlikely to happen.
> Denis
> Note: Archive of the mailing list:
> Hi,
> The GNAP protocol has a dependency on the Subject Identifiers draft [1] from the SecEvent working group. That draft has been around for a long time and in fact has just been updated by the authors (much appreciated!), but we’ve had a hard time moving it across the finish line at the SecEvent group. I am looking for one or more volunteers to join as co-authors, preferably people who are *not* authors on the GNAP protocol.
> The Subject ID draft should go into an abbreviated second WG last call, and then assuming everything goes well, into IETF last call and IESG review. The main task of the new author(s) would be to address IESG comments in a timely manner and move the draft to publication.
> If you are new to the IETF, this is a great opportunity to familiarize yourself with its publication process.
> Please get back to me or Leif for any additional details.
> Thanks,
> 	Yaron
> [1]
> --
> TXAuth mailing list