Re: [GNAP] [OAUTH-WG] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-gnap-core-protocol-15

I was looking over the upcoming SF agenda and was very surprised to see
that the gnap session overlaps with the oauth session,

Is the GNAP WG intentionally wanting to avoid engaging with members of the
OAUTH WG?

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 4:13 PM Kristina Yasuda <
Kristina.Yasuda@microsoft.com> wrote:

> I would like to get some context too.
>
> After WGLC that started on Jan-07
> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>, I could only find one
> email
> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/TohrHLdZXnzCi49vvE8Xi9QcLqE/>
> on the mailing list <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>.
> Not sure who else’s feedback has been addressed in the changes mentioned in
> this email
> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/nT8wHCJqLrZrJDR30I7TL5xyYUs/>
> .
>
> IETF116 meeting notes
> <https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-116-gnap#GNAP-core-status> mention
> that there are some issues (token rotation) that need to be discussed and
> looks like there was an interim mtg, but there is nothing on the outcome of
> that mtg in the ML. (at least I can’t find the minutes).
>
>
>
> I also noticed that out of 8 implementations listed in the implementation
> statu
> <https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-core-protocol/pull/504/files#diff-7b8259b080e6bc43f36d8a9a56f271c41f6a6471e088496ea8e25c2c6fec98acR5760>s
> as of Mar-06, four mention production, and other four are prototype (and
> given one of those is SecureKey and another one is Gen Digital (ex. Secure
> Key), that relationship should probably be clarified).
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Kristina
>
>
>
> *From:* OAuth <oauth-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of * Dick Hardt
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 28, 2023 2:05 PM
> *To:* Yaron Sheffer via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
> *Cc:* gnap-chairs@ietf.org; yaronf.ietf@gmail.com; iesg-secretary@ietf.org;
> txauth@ietf.org; oauth@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] [GNAP] Publication has been requested for
> draft-ietf-gnap-core-protocol-15
>
>
>
> I just noticed this doc is up for publication.
>
>
>
> I did a quick search on the last call discussion, and did not see any +1s,
> nor any review by any of the active members of the OAuth WG.
>
>
>
> This is very surprising given the functional overlap with OAuth 2.0, and
> the years of deployment experience in the group.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 1:16 PM Yaron Sheffer via Datatracker <
> noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Yaron Sheffer has requested publication of
> draft-ietf-gnap-core-protocol-15 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the GNAP
> working group.
>
> Please verify the document's state at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-gnap-core-protocol/
>
>
> --
> TXAuth mailing list
> TXAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>
>