[GNAP] Some remaining issues about the core-protocol

Denis <denis.ietf@free.fr> Thu, 06 May 2021 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <denis.ietf@free.fr>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E893A243A for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 May 2021 07:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.719
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2bpjaSOCWcW6 for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 May 2021 07:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp08.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F7D33A2437 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 May 2021 07:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([90.26.94.159]) by mwinf5d67 with ME id 1SVq250053SJSnu03SVqow; Thu, 06 May 2021 16:29:53 +0200
X-ME-Helo: [192.168.1.11]
X-ME-Auth: ZGVuaXMucGlua2FzQG9yYW5nZS5mcg==
X-ME-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 16:29:53 +0200
X-ME-IP: 90.26.94.159
To: "txauth@ietf.org" <txauth@ietf.org>
From: Denis <denis.ietf@free.fr>
Message-ID: <0536f389-ea4f-358c-7142-91d41fe8924a@free.fr>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 16:29:51 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------22A20F4D6D1D5E47F0901CD5"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/TEWNSKhW5pd_v33Kwx0OPoIPQl0>
Subject: [GNAP] Some remaining issues about the core-protocol
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNAP <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 14:30:00 -0000

Hello,

The mailing list has been pretty silent these last days.

Hereafter is a quick overview about some of the remaining issues 
classified by order of  importance (from my point of view).


  1. User choice and consent, and user notice #215

smartopain wote:

To draw a parallel: Since the publication of the EU GDPR (General Data 
Protection Regulation) the use of the cookies has changed.
An end-user is allowed to accept them all, to deny them all (except 
functional cookies) and even to make some choices.
The end-users can know which legal entity will collect the cookies and 
what for.

The same kind of screens should be proposed to the end-user.
*From a technical perspective, specific end-points should be defined and 
used, since this kind of dialog is done using APIs.*

  I agree with smartopain.

*2. Trust relationships **#214*

There are still left undefined. AS-RS trust relationships are important. 
RO relationships with both ASs and RSs are veryimportant
but unfortunately are discussed nowhere in the current draft (except in 
text proposals about this issue)

*3. **Interaction (1) between the Client Instance and the RS as 
described in the first figure **#252*

Still on the table but not progressing.


  4. The first figure in section 1.4 should be split and revisited #192

This is still not done.


  5. Unlinkability #241

Still on the table but not progressing.


  6. Requesting User Information #197

This is still a hazy topic.


  Denis