[GNAP] Input on GNAP terminology
Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com> Thu, 12 November 2020 19:54 UTC
Return-Path: <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FA63A02BD for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:54:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yf9pKlgRgJVa for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:54:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56B433A02C1 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:54:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id r12so7353177iot.4 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:54:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mrTm7kpnXeBlojkFC/Y/FM6/OPrHYBbK7e5JLUt3LWk=; b=qWrKst+HL+zecXFTqqGLSz0cr2FjUNuNWf69ifF+JqQc8fYKljn3moPVXocvT9Ajid Hop+O5wDW1aX8P63m2NG0uyjUIyGBirE21gu0JMNqKQqsW16lkFZQ6v5CHqzBNgLjGr8 l89WZI0Nt4lR04rtz0IIxXi6B7DJXHkqOslz1NucKQ+DBs38yKcAFGoBGWxnx4RufMTy XLs6wf+CJl2xtE/43vorFIS0eqH4Akxz8waC7L+isYF8+Y9z3p9fkPIaW1peMoKtRFkF UDd1AEVJy4H11+iIDj5A+dmk2ZNZjnznOktSuCfJrh+Ej2u+16WXe8RjE0eiFiaRGZmN qQMw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mrTm7kpnXeBlojkFC/Y/FM6/OPrHYBbK7e5JLUt3LWk=; b=RjNmoghXnnGyp8zY1SL+8YdreD7MpXrIfDTKPJMJprJPuIJLyj1cMniMIqfAH8Hamu rJvzQjbISiyWfXMbxTZxArRFhpfBbGs+78Gf+8VgAXsRXlL0TPsLJHfGMglOg9MPoZv2 vn/ALxvL+9B8mTLQ1kndlWGbWejjWq3+4ZaZTCkcW1WTjCe2tHKT15TqxwmfM6rYlbFS kRX22HL4nZhYzGBBYUJUpDnTGkAeL2PBwChdqOXiA93IZwvP4RW/kB0NzH3MfTkvrjKA 7qDsNeLhceUu3xLevQyDS3BupfbsRHkH/43tt6mR2ZnVuOa+4GXsIcV2+sytE8/E3Bxl ykKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jBq3bDiQfYTZrHZGN/jt8uH5p/dX7++Opn5EQupbSRgtwI3cR MnInJnA+CZJUCVDyAr/+Q472BlFowkbk4qrAWeO1bOPBiDRAeQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwpD1zBCuFXpby66n8TDgzuPHLtULZYGFzWp/yiJy+npoadFsDGD11MFUIJsS/eLknHFjqD4HWSIMQb1hE3uHM=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:48:: with SMTP id 69mr1144599jaa.108.1605210850388; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:54:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 20:53:59 +0100
Message-ID: <CAM8feuRqxgqR1QngtNzSZMZa_5NqfrBb4zgOU-46M028iJJsOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: GNAP Mailing List <txauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000086ed8005b3ee468d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/h3HFmRPl8O7MFtGvVsbFdzf18fc>
Subject: [GNAP] Input on GNAP terminology
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNAP <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:54:13 -0000
Hi everyone, I've created a new issue that deals with terminology. https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-core-protocol/issues/29 We'd like to get your feedback on this, either informally (on the mailing list) or better if you have a concrete proposal, please comment on the issue directly. The objective is to make a PR that regroups the suggested changes related to the terminology, and also to describe the rationale for our choices within the git (so that we can get back to it later on). Cheers Fabien
- [GNAP] Input on GNAP terminology Fabien Imbault