IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GNAP] Human Rights Protocol Considerations applied to GNAP

Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com> Tue, 08 November 2022 07:47 UTC

Return-Path: <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCEEC14CE3E for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 23:47:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MUY-_dChBJ3u for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 23:47:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62f.google.com (mail-pl1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B1BFC14CE31 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 23:47:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id p21so13444641plr.7 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 23:47:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yQdoaHmQi/PdwWgKb1E+ScgjMlIp5+8cVRbsRhM6psM=; b=YMM2Ktt9ceku+GQ8zKNOKV0tz4RzglRWLMhOokuV1CpspA/5seOkkmgha6f+ehbgVq 4DgqkLXHuOZ/jHz8XN68ROKSjbzqCZ50MsG8i1DeGZ5wM9/wrvb2aVjN7ci7E1KmBB2m q76ryKkpRKdNAUuCL2T1H26yJfZUciZKqk0oG7K5Dq48PAtNXo5fcYKqG1iNoU9LYgc4 Wzx3hPtZOAUTi+pld9qA/TCT0fWM5HI3QwSR7URAkYMxzQESJyJxy5qWk8+eYBb0vhVV Rqw5uhQNItZH8x0gGAwqY5tv2QZHJ1lH/Xy3xBrwJOaXj+o/Yyb8IUrQBSYk6eRBxTQ5 lTYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=yQdoaHmQi/PdwWgKb1E+ScgjMlIp5+8cVRbsRhM6psM=; b=nqhJR73pRlunqTFqhcXg4UVTp/qCIwBj5dcxEfN51/G7z+21+43Jl7HLupG6Fu+SyJ 4/OQPwqQ7k/35HjJ3TP31MJ8FnKpRCd0X9syN9n4bJmfYR/kxKNoWOlz239bCZekE/AH M9Gw9k8pSsvV+Gt3kILUOCqrB4+Sv2WxU032HxyC0SHgFXlHL/KVu688Vq6oSvzTQbcn HvqxiHt4zfNA9j8HYBCPJdLujcreS88HbmUhQ0ukazzp7LegyWHliYSzd2h7AuzAzg2l H6jDx3opSjo3PdUimP6pxjglZ4lMMe7WtQ5FTMPjRWTgDjyfFmDE+cxKEYqTQg/w0rp1 5NzQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2CxlSFOTkGYqEagJhF9QYyvGM+8BikO0468OY+nbpL52Ibhzpn qv6GSkuFoQVkhUgHrKHILUgtIdBEbTZKm+5KDs0cEKkX
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4M7g8gToOwM+YWluzxgKYCz7TpJFclU0NPsNck8pVfLZhdkLxe0yxoZlG9eeR3gs4SLhasnqCzCdN9S0GVcJ0=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:834c:b0:187:49e0:fd4d with SMTP id z12-20020a170902834c00b0018749e0fd4dmr32442999pln.81.1667893621875; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 23:47:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANYRo8ju62xOsbfsey-3U9nzUG+zxW-=dOeaRvbCwp5aS4O3BQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANYRo8ju62xOsbfsey-3U9nzUG+zxW-=dOeaRvbCwp5aS4O3BQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2022 08:46:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CAM8feuTLSDBFSsK3sTxBPwH3CwsM-7+SXyOPTHyRV+nWr43==g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com>
Cc: GNAP Mailing List <txauth@ietf.org>, hrpc@irtf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000daebca05ecf0be11"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/jP3aGvZfdqMpgfQW77qfPQOlQ8k>
Subject: Re: [GNAP] Human Rights Protocol Considerations applied to GNAP
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNAP <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2022 07:47:06 -0000

Hi everyone,

The current PR is available at
https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/pull/55

Please notice that it has been created for the RS spec because that's where
mitigations can be effective.

Best regards,
Fabien


On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, 07:14 Adrian Gropper, <agropper@healthurl.com> wrote:

> The GNAP protocol risks creating a forced association per HRPC.
>
> A draft PR is at
> https://deploy-preview-434--gnap-core-protocol-editors-draft.netlify.app/draft-ietf-gnap-core-protocol#section-13 (This
> PR was closed in the core spec pending a potential move to the resource
> server spec as discussed in [4].)
>
> Here's what I'm hoping is discussed between the GNAP review of the Human
> Rights Considerations PR on Thursday and the HRPC Discussion on Friday:
>
> 1 - The HRPC Abstract explicitly addresses "forced association" [1]
> 2 - GNAP is primarily a delegated authorization protocol [2]
> 3 - Delegation can be to the clients, authorization servers, and end-users
> roles in GNAP.
> 4 - Forced association with a delegate might be a human rights issue.
> 5 - A PR was submitted that discusses the human rights issue, referencing
> HRPC, as well as mitigations [3]
> 6 - The PR and subsequent comments describe three possible mitigations [4]
> 7 - Antecedent authorization protocols, such as OAuth, that force
> association have led to unintended platform network effects.
> 8 - Guidance from HRPC is sought as to the process by which (GNAP / IETF?)
> decides if the mitigations are to be a SHOULD?
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/115/agenda/hrpc-drafts.pdf
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/115/agenda/gnap-drafts.pdf
> [3[ https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-core-protocol/pull/434
> [4] https://github.com/ietf-wg-gnap/gnap-resource-servers/issues/54
>
> The PR will be discussed in GNAP on Thursday Session 1.
> The HRPC discussion is on Friday Session 1.
> I hope many will participate in both sessions.
>
> - Adrian
>
> --
> TXAuth mailing list
> TXAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email