IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tzdist] WG Document Adoption

Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu> Mon, 25 August 2014 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
X-Original-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB6B1A8947 for <tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 06:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QZYX3PMT-4QJ for <tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 06:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.andrew.cmu.edu (SMTP.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.157.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A6081A894B for <tzdist@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 06:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (cpe-76-180-151-43.buffalo.res.rr.com [76.180.151.43]) (user=murch mech=PLAIN (0 bits)) by smtp.andrew.cmu.edu (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s7PDfxPl014912 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <tzdist@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:42:00 -0400
Message-ID: <53FB3D27.5050803@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:41:59 -0400
From: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tzdist@ietf.org
References: <CADZyTkkGJq00MKgatrebvLiRaUpYpDqWr3CCULRuf_+Ov547HQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADZyTkmxY4hBhvdcoSEst+hbF54iLTOzmWh9eJJJtYQH5vMENQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTkmxY4hBhvdcoSEst+hbF54iLTOzmWh9eJJJtYQH5vMENQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050400090909070503000302"
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.8.25.133318
X-SMTP-Spam-Clean: 32% ( SXL_IP_DYNAMIC 3, TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, BODYTEXTH_SIZE_10000_LESS 0, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, DATE_TZ_NA 0, FROM_EDU_TLD 0, LINK_TO_IMAGE 0, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED 0, RDNS_POOLED 0, RDNS_RESIDENTIAL 0, RDNS_SUSP 0, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC 0, RDNS_SUSP_SPECIFIC 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BAT_BOUNDARY 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __FRAUD_BODY_WEBMAIL 0, __FRAUD_CONTACT_NUM 0, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_HTML 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MOZILLA_MSGID 0, __MOZILLA_USER_AGENT 0, __RDNS_POOLED_1 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __STOCK_PHRASE_7 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TO_IN_SUBJECT 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_NS , __USER_AGENT 0)
X-SMTP-Spam-Score: 32%
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 128.2.157.39
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tzdist/qAaDrT40fA2XuT_4AVq4IqO8VJI
Subject: Re: [Tzdist] WG Document Adoption
X-BeenThere: tzdist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <tzdist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tzdist/>
List-Post: <mailto:tzdist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:42:11 -0000

Reiterating my support for adopting both drafts.



On 08/25/2014 04:49 AM, Daniel Migault wrote:
> Dear friends and colleague,
>
> A lot of comments have been sent on the mailing on the two drafts, and 
> it seems that the WG agrees on starting with theses two drafts.
>
> However, we would like a more clear support for adoption of these two 
> drafts, so please respond to this thread today indicating you support  
> -- or not -- the adoption of these two drafts.
>
> BR
>
> Daniel and Eliot
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com 
> <mailto:mglt.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Dear friends and colleagues,
>
>     Our Milestones mention the adoption of the time zone data
>     distribution protocol draft and CalDAV extension draft as Working
>     Group document.
>
>     We propose the adoption of the following drafts. Once these
>     documents are accepted as WG document, these documents will be
>     discussed, commented until the WG decides they are ready.
>
>     Please let us know if you want these documents or if you have
>     strong objections to have these documents as a starting point for
>     the WG. Acceptance or rejection should be based on the global
>     design of the propositions, not about nits and protocol details.
>     Please let us know your opinion by Tuesday August 26.
>
>     Of course you are welcome to submit comments on these documents,
>     to raise discussions.
>     The documents are:
>         - draft-douglass-timezone-service-11 [1]
>         - draft-daboo-caldav-timezone-ref-01 [2]
>
>
>     Daniel and Eliot
>
>
>     [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-douglass-timezone-service-11
>     [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-daboo-caldav-timezone-ref-01
>
>
>     -- 
>     Daniel Migault
>     Orange Labs -- Security
>     +33 6 70 72 69 58 <tel:%2B33%206%2070%2072%2069%2058>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Daniel Migault
> Orange Labs -- Security
> +33 6 70 72 69 58
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tzdist mailing list
> Tzdist@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist


-- 
Kenneth Murchison
Principal Systems Software Engineer
Carnegie Mellon University

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email