IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Unbearable] reviewing our 00's

Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> Tue, 21 April 2015 06:55 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@sunet.se>
X-Original-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38EE71B2DD9 for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 23:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AVKWljO6a46S for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 23:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e-mailfilter01.sunet.se (e-mailfilter01.sunet.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:8:2::201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A82661B366B for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 23:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.sunet.se (smtp1.sunet.se [192.36.171.214]) by e-mailfilter01.sunet.se (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id t3L6tlSL010985 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 08:55:47 +0200
Received: from kerio.sunet.se (kerio.sunet.se [192.36.171.210]) by smtp1.sunet.se (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t3L6ti5X005206 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 08:55:47 +0200 (CEST)
VBR-Info: md=sunet.se; mc=all; mv=swamid.se
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sunet.se; s=default; t=1429599347; bh=rqkAA+ZjoVTjbt6Rzrr5iLNfvqxV4NvmNwCgy5illrk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=tfc/lRJ6POBSsD1GJlSMkGMJSsqYV6YOssGrerCIBV6slDrISLKPAYBCOv1DC8IPA k6XwcwmjZbmwWDKVMDUVrs7kT43CNDVxaB0Xsvg+4Rs5wbBDaR/3tkZqWrUKR3ve8F vSCmp7X6AjW71uhIpKNJIsT52z4BJ2bCaEJQIHY0=
X-Footer: c3VuZXQuc2U=
Received: from [10.1.0.181] ([193.10.248.8]) (authenticated user leifj@sunet.se) by kerio.sunet.se (Kerio Connect 8.3.4 patch 1) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits)) for unbearable@ietf.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 08:55:43 +0200
Message-ID: <5535F46F.80406@sunet.se>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 08:55:43 +0200
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: unbearable@ietf.org
References: <55325D1C.1080807@sunet.se> <20150418165751.GA14171@LK-Perkele-VII> <BN3PR0301MB1250245882F27445BB32EFEF8CE00@BN3PR0301MB1250.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN3PR0301MB1250245882F27445BB32EFEF8CE00@BN3PR0301MB1250.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: outbound, outbound-sunet-se:default, sunet-se:default, base:default, @@RPTN)
X-CanIt-Geo: ip=192.36.171.210; country=SE; latitude=59.3294; longitude=18.0686; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=59.3294,18.0686&z=6
X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound-sunet-se:outbound (inherits from outbound-sunet-se:default, sunet-se:default, base:default)
X-Canit-Stats-ID: 09OiuTLAK - db3d7ff039ca - 20150421
X-CanIt-Archive-Cluster: PfMRe/vJWMiXwM2YIH5BVExnUnw
Received-SPF: neutral (e-mailfilter01.sunet.se: 192.36.171.210 is neither permitted nor denied by domain leifj@sunet.se) receiver=e-mailfilter01.sunet.se; client-ip=192.36.171.210; envelope-from=<leifj@sunet.se>; helo=smtp1.sunet.se; identity=mailfrom
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 192.36.171.201
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unbearable/UvvVOmLBqh0ouLzV-b5Iq4S0ICw>
Subject: Re: [Unbearable] reviewing our 00's
X-BeenThere: unbearable@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"This list is for discussion of proposals for doing better than bearer tokens \(e.g. HTTP cookies, OAuth tokens etc.\) for web applications. The specific goal is chartering a WG focused on preventing security token export and replay attacks.\"" <unbearable.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/unbearable/>
List-Post: <mailto:unbearable@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 06:55:52 -0000

On 04/20/2015 11:54 PM, Andrei Popov wrote:
> Hi Ilari,
> 
> 1) Agreement has been reached in Dallas that we will define a new TLS extension to negotiate Token Binding key parameters, instead of using ALPN. I hope to publish a new I-D for the TLS extension, and update  draft-ietf-tokbind-protocol in the next 2-3 weeks.
> 

Why don't you make a note in the appropriate issue to this fact so we
don't have to revisit.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status