IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Unbearable] [TokenBinding/Internet-Drafts] HTTPSTB: use "same-site" rather than "first-party" terminology (#44)

John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Fri, 01 July 2016 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C9012D7B2 for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ve7jtb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yG-YLskhh-CO for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22e.google.com (mail-qk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1468812D760 for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:36:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id t127so216379144qkf.1 for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 11:36:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ve7jtb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=Sv98gKkgxfHKx4McswBiT8KnkbtFeAlAOW3mnFT3f7E=; b=L5Ye0B9taaK6SB2r5sajFlgfRIxrbnevcjyFDjDgZNOqzgnk34D8jIol8CgIh4GFlo 5mbzx1tvY0JrlVyNyMJL+YC+mMPscmlm5EJPb2S4c/x5bZYSCy8omtZGaacWRbofshNh o9ddojql3OqavwOFNiGYzHVyAwxtkRfqf9YoHXrpBEiy2gvNU1unUu8glb3nHyXO9FPq YOcSz7T35M/1S/mtU0PkHY9Z3lkqgLEM/Sb/lb5SBKZ384fJfNWu1qRVLiXoRQS+oIWS PFoyHcVB2PtrRscDlj1hSUOw0fh/wWHSiKpHA/Nv+MVANRKzsqpmfeaAMmjF7UOLREGq UloA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=Sv98gKkgxfHKx4McswBiT8KnkbtFeAlAOW3mnFT3f7E=; b=KUlIGTRSIX/ARvkgNmGiug34V/s5ku9fM8Ugck4t4uXVgC7Y3gsec6w6p+Pa6szAZd dX8/A6u4/eSiOlNxjQKm0CffW01XI34XJvuqC6kyqll834fDLPS/LNCeOBQglIP9tpbj k2r9e24QDIIe3rESF/lKx4vKGAR3JbZgBZuYjExyfAl6lmuN38syH/DbZHrqTyBWTMDw rCHyIZFBcFCJ8DcSxS54KPXWSftD2pZAIjeBwzcLR4lgSwOSeXVbTmOmpS63J3APUSgN /AavS0f30x9zW8gkXTSv826JHuH1M3wfDFOzYekEoitxcA9BC59CDu4LopqqHL7Jxc6n szdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJ6zkOAiBNHEEbpkouFSoNU8CgR72nmN3zCPlHSg8ayda7jqFUEYow39o4FpfLeYA==
X-Received: by 10.55.201.70 with SMTP id q67mr27716291qki.124.1467398176159; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 11:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.41] ([191.115.51.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f53sm2799465qtf.25.2016.07.01.11.36.04 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Jul 2016 11:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_425E16D4-7B00-46FE-AA86-9605643607E6"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <TokenBinding/Internet-Drafts/issues/44@github.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 14:35:29 -0400
Message-Id: <6DC1B959-8AFE-49C4-B883-954A3D345751@ve7jtb.com>
References: <TokenBinding/Internet-Drafts/issues/44@github.com>
To: TokenBinding/Internet-Drafts <reply+0000f827911c593a2877d05d7091cfeac51efcb243a01a2e92cf00000001138e627b92a169ce09bdd26c@reply.github.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unbearable/xougjWg8dPN5rPPr0bn79kcdKhc>
Cc: TokenBinding/Internet-Drafts <Internet-Drafts@noreply.github.com>, IETF Tokbind WG <unbearable@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Unbearable] [TokenBinding/Internet-Drafts] HTTPSTB: use "same-site" rather than "first-party" terminology (#44)
X-BeenThere: unbearable@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"This list is for discussion of proposals for doing better than bearer tokens \(e.g. HTTP cookies, OAuth tokens etc.\) for web applications. The specific goal is chartering a WG focused on preventing security token export and replay attacks.\"" <unbearable.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/unbearable/>
List-Post: <mailto:unbearable@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 18:36:25 -0000

That make sense to do now.


> On Jul 1, 2016, at 12:55 PM, =JeffH <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> 
> In the HTTP WG's efforts to update the "cookies" spec RFC6265, we've settled on the terms "same-site" (rather than "first-party") and "cross-site" (rather than "third-party").
> 
> I do not doubt HTTPSTB will receive feedback during last calls on the "first-party" and "federation" terms, and so think we should make such a terminology change now. We can do it by drawing equivalence between "same-site" & "first-party", and "federation" & "cross-site".
> 
> see also: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-same-site <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-same-site>, and #43 <https://github.com/TokenBinding/Internet-Drafts/issues/43>
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/TokenBinding/Internet-Drafts/issues/44>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AAD4J3QL02d4Azgf-YAqv7MAENYQcU1Nks5qRUZ7gaJpZM4JDUDE>.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email