[Unwanted-trackers] Process for Non-owner controls
정진규 <jingyu.jeong@samsung.com> Tue, 02 April 2024 10:43 UTC
Return-Path: <jingyu.jeong@samsung.com>
X-Original-To: unwanted-trackers@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: unwanted-trackers@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21B8C14F685 for <unwanted-trackers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 03:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.074
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.074 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.08, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=samsung.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HKGdyhFxKMVE for <unwanted-trackers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 03:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout3.samsung.com (mailout3.samsung.com [203.254.224.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4135BC14F684 for <unwanted-trackers@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 03:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from epcas1p4.samsung.com (unknown [182.195.41.48]) by mailout3.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id 20240402104258epoutp03d89326f9983f531736ee34ded5ce7e22~CcJFjd-o42836528365epoutp03t for <unwanted-trackers@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:42:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailout3.samsung.com 20240402104258epoutp03d89326f9983f531736ee34ded5ce7e22~CcJFjd-o42836528365epoutp03t
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samsung.com; s=mail20170921; t=1712054578; bh=YHqWBZeHX7rsDTIVMXEJO22es3gvcSpCsPW3JWWsSG4=; h=Subject:Reply-To:From:To:Date:References:From; b=hx1dyHakBofXsm1OjiRBPfRNnkg7JiCBu+B3FV14/LRvE1uZ+rBA9x98qLnrCv1fr 35d6AxFLHbpgF82cNBNU0cSNLau6gikUwRQrDVnIqI6F5ZVog4bRaChO9/V9PXg/JJ NB+p9AqUQgimxW97ddP4d7CTQdA7zj91ut7j1hCI=
Received: from epsnrtp3.localdomain (unknown [182.195.42.164]) by epcas1p1.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id 20240402104257epcas1p16bea1b6738afeb69229d5442300ac3e6~CcJEmQVJR0792607926epcas1p1l; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:42:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from epsmges1p5.samsung.com (unknown [182.195.38.234]) by epsnrtp3.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4V84GR4jXwz4x9Q2; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:42:55 +0000 (GMT)
X-AuditID: b6c32a39-59dff7000000275c-73-660be12feed8
Received: from epcas1p3.samsung.com ( [182.195.41.47]) by epsmges1p5.samsung.com (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 25.4A.10076.F21EB066; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:42:55 +0900 (KST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: jingyu.jeong@samsung.com
Sender: 정진규 <jingyu.jeong@samsung.com>
From: 정진규 <jingyu.jeong@samsung.com>
To: "unwanted-trackers@ietf.org" <unwanted-trackers@ietf.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-Content-Kind-Code: NORMAL
X-Drm-Type: N,general
X-Msg-Generator: Mail
X-Msg-Type: PERSONAL
X-Reply-Demand: N
Message-ID: <20240402104255epcms1p41066adfdff98d5f9c2740fd11ea48bf5@epcms1p4>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 19:42:55 +0900
X-CMS-MailID: 20240402104255epcms1p41066adfdff98d5f9c2740fd11ea48bf5
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="SCore-CAFE"
CMS-TYPE: 101P
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupjk+LIzCtJLcpLzFFi42LZdlhTX1f/IXeawYlbShZT7h5nt/h4Zjqr xcJ1jhZzlzazObB4LFnyk8mjb8sqxgCmqGybjNTElNQihdS85PyUzLx0WyXv4HjneFMzA0Nd Q0sLcyWFvMTcVFslF58AXbfMHKBFSgpliTmlQKGAxOJiJX07m6L80pJUhYz84hJbpdSClJwC 0wK94sTc4tK8dL281BIrQwMDI1OgwoTsjN5PO1gKfh1irlg2uZ21gbF7O3MXIyeHhICJxPoj q9m6GLk4hAR2MEqcWHudqYuRg4NXQFDi7w5hkBphAWuJJzc6GEFsIQElicOLLzHCxJfces8E YrMJWErcf7SUDcQWEbCVeNM6D2o+r8SM9qcsELa0xPblWxkhbFGJm6vfssPY74/Nh4qLSLTe OwvVKyjx4OduqLikxIldT6Hi5RKzT51kBLlZQqCFUeLWku9MEAlziZWHT4IdwSvgK/G96R4b yC8sAqoS01+5QJS4SLz5dJ8VxGYWMJO4cWI2M4TNJ/Huaw8rzM075j0BB4OEgJrEiiOJEGEZ iTnz26HCHhILLupCQiRQYuvkTawTGGVmIcJtFpL5ELaixJTuh+wQtoZE65y5ULa4xIfDs5kw 1ahLnNqzhBm/GjWJBe+Xsi5g5FrFKJZaUJybnlpsWGAKTwHJ+bmbGMEJU8tyB+P0tx/0DjEy cTAeYpTgYFYS4f3pzZkmxJuSWFmVWpQfX1Sak1p8iNEUGFoTmaVEk/OBKTuvJN7QxNLAxMzI 2MTC0MxQSZz3zJWyVCGB9MSS1OzU1ILUIpg+Jg5OqQYm89scawy4LPM2P1Q4UPvA1SuDIXdD 01OX9gT5w1q3ORkU5HyeM0uGm3T/kn3vu2DfMrXF0Z05zf/dHvLecOFXWGQbmyUkrZG2b3nP WsM/v13nLYs4Vje11uZa/JrL0jYTP5mbWBuJHP30q3ffnsk1p0ucN5X0vK5v/Pr+2O+Ioyr3 7P6vVHizec9HporZyyaUWvca1RzZZJnEVJOsVbP7w9Smxj1HNqsH5L29ZGH08GDL2T+yidOF 1Z+aHPh7YL/9tBSTOxoBcxPKs+9HRJuout0PXRn7P8CIVaHt0LeLRxWnnJd4sEf+Qf0Mxer8 3Eo+qYvZ4V9WyzvnvVc7f+3LX6fr+7/87bM+3LJxl3CHEktxRqKhFnNRcSIA/PvQuSEEAAA=
DLP-Filter: Pass
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-CMS-RootMailID: 20240402104255epcms1p41066adfdff98d5f9c2740fd11ea48bf5
References: <CGME20240402104255epcms1p41066adfdff98d5f9c2740fd11ea48bf5@epcms1p4>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unwanted-trackers/hVoaHiPUSgVaJ_WQIDwOuPb820o>
Subject: [Unwanted-trackers] Process for Non-owner controls
X-BeenThere: unwanted-trackers@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Detecting Unwanted Location Trackers working group of the IETF." <unwanted-trackers.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unwanted-trackers>, <mailto:unwanted-trackers-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/unwanted-trackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:unwanted-trackers@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unwanted-trackers-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unwanted-trackers>, <mailto:unwanted-trackers-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 10:47:53 -0000
Hi everyone,
I have an opinion on 3.12.4.(Non-owner controls).
We would need one-time non-owner command key to make the sound of the separated tracker. Considering the process for above, the application conveys encrypted data from the separated tracker to the server to get the one-time non-owner command key. If this process is not given, anyone can abuse the seperated tracker such as below.
1) An application makes unspecified multiple trackers' sound simultaneously.
2) An application makes the tracker's sound continuously without any interval.
I think Sound maker is crucial for detecting the hidden tracker. However, abusing separated trackers is another story. There could be separated trackers which innocent people have lost and should not be abused.
I hope the use of one-time non-owner command key to be added as 'Recommended' on the standard.
Best regards,
|