IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Uri-review] Review Provisional registration for app URI scheme

Stian Soiland-Reyes <stain@apache.org> Wed, 17 January 2018 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <stain@apache.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E5612773A for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 06:46:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.93
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.93 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a1EgFQ40e1FG for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 06:46:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 641D712F4C0 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 06:46:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 99864 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2018 14:46:51 -0000
Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 14:46:51 +0000
Received: from localhost (fb065306-1ecd-4974-a503-9c7871092168.net [84.92.48.26]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 8F9691A00E2 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 14:46:50 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 14:46:47 +0000
Message-ID: <20180117144647.GC5245@biggie>
From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <stain@apache.org>
To: uri-review@ietf.org
References:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/B2OYkX7_BTs4EBtH0A8Y_4hPkdQ>
Subject: [Uri-review] Review Provisional registration for app URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 14:48:33 -0000

   Scheme name: app

   Status: provisional

   Applications/protocols that use this protocol: 
     Hypermedia-consuming application that handle archives.

   Contact: Stian Soiland-Reyes stain@apache.org [1]

   Change controller: Stian Soiland-Reyes

   References:
   
   https://rawgit.com/stain/I-D/master/app/app.html
   https://github.com/stain/I-D/tree/master/app


I am intending to submit the above as an invididual Internet-Draft and then
update References accordingly; I am not sure if I should do the provisional
registration first or do them together?

BTW; to which IANA body should I submit the Internet-Draft for review?

-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email