Re: [Uri-review] Registration request for smtp:// and submit:// URI schemes (draft-melnikov-smime-msa-to-mda-04)

["Martin J. Dürst" <[e-mail]>]

On 2014/04/02 02:33, Dave Thaler wrote:
> Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>>> My feedback is that the name "submit" is not a good name for the proposed

>>> "smtpsubmit" or similar would be much more appropriate.
>>
>> I would rather use the same label as used by DNS SRV for the same service:
>> "submission". (I think keeping them different would be a bad thing.). Thoughts?

If the SRV service name is "submission", and the proposed scheme name is 
"submit", aren't these two *different* labels?

> I didn't know about the SRV service type before this, but yes that sounds like a
> reasonable goal.
>
> I'm thinking it would be good to add a sentence about this case
> (service names and URI scheme names SHOULD be the same, when there exists
> a 1:1 correspondence) to draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-scheme-reg.  Does that
> sound reasonable?

Yes. I'm not sure it needs to be a SHOULD, something like "consider to 
make this the same as...".

Regards,   Martin.