[Uri-review] Request review for URI schemes for CoAP over reliable transports
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 21 April 2017 05:32 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DC2127B52 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9BXauB-vMFy7 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BFD6124BFA for <Uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3L5W8dp002336 for <Uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:32:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p5DC7F3A7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.243.167]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3w8PWD25QXzDHfn; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:32:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 514445527.541488-c73989d8da1adc204e00209e3865b148
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:32:07 +0200
Message-Id: <802AE026-F28E-4DCF-8E86-584F39C1A75A@tzi.org>
To: Uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/KaK24TtfeqAipzUUwl4zv5EbFIo>
Subject: [Uri-review] Request review for URI schemes for CoAP over reliable transports
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 05:32:20 -0000
It seems we never formally requested a review of the four new URI schemes for CoAP over TCP, TLS, and WebSockets, as requested in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-coap-tcp-tls-07#section-10.5 To summarize these four schemes: coap-tcp-URI = "coap+tcp:" "//" host [ ":" port ] path-abempty [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ] coaps-tcp-URI = "coaps+tcp:" "//" host [ ":" port ] path-abempty [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ] coap-ws-URI = "coap+ws:" "//" host [ ":" port ] path-abempty [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ] coaps-ws-URI = "coaps+ws:" "//" host [ ":" port ] path-abempty [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ] For the details, please see the draft, which has completed IETF last call. (These are patterned after “coap:” and “coaps:” in RFC 7252, which are defined over UDP and DTLS, respectively.) Grüße, Carsten
- [Uri-review] Request review for URI schemes for C… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Uri-review] Request review for URI schemes f… Graham Klyne