IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Is TCP a URI scheme?

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 01 February 2019 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C7C1310B5 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 09:18:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HCjhtmpaOESe for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 09:18:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2c.google.com (mail-io1-xd2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BFE91310B4 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 09:18:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2c.google.com with SMTP id r200so6248769iod.11 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Feb 2019 09:18:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mueBDHhtVQvXAj8pXmSA8xC4cvYPsdM3H6tdShXEJqk=; b=M2fel2giHF/m66tUCqMzsQP/Qm+/Gsx+f4FDMajuz5DZEizSS/0YNNFLf+oNfC88JV +gF6Ot/mESpARA4ROEizEEuCaZ9cqKXOnHv+XKPjKXvIZyfkUOPVI48o+PDSdUQi9O1q fdIRgbSNPcDGvwgj3Ph3l1FWAjj7cCvn5JvXCexTLKJhtc/UKz7swKNF4VZPrcbmDpxf 4GsNeiuRx4rhzeGE9VZQcYJXgqxRxNPBqU+SV6HSmgi/2en5xuRF1vxxbQWJFcxvrRA0 LlTbYMQf4dm9DHTvBEaBxGI7mHBZ6uemV2zJrgRZQENE+hI88YWzEsG+EoRuHNYyHMzp pXpw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mueBDHhtVQvXAj8pXmSA8xC4cvYPsdM3H6tdShXEJqk=; b=B2k5MoCWlDDE07yscEvNfxLygsUVDG7mq9pJOxytY9qtMhtR2EtkO8D/We7cYrRAUg YD0hyuGVeSBOmNa68BX0NgFKJ68oVsNxs+XCk+BUwa1JQusZQXbx/OHjKFcbAsCCl1li WS2a5coFxKjo4bMXya7L6BLSgU4SRLIDXDrbHY3MbZ3rw0h8X88WBB7Y3N13GVAD0JwX KB0vGa5EwDTR11x+tH1YkOrxBD336KyUIm8XvMvs4EJJGS6vllbrLwW11kG3vJOy5Pod y1UGYzgMOdjmvgkkltuXwNPeWf6s8vxCtsJfNoREt82NBcj6TUJ2v7tLKbrSsQkXTlMT 5riA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukc9Ksr+6VnNeXvR/RkRqTh3V+Cy+sS0jKroiY4lhAhvmZIvrxPN jmAKzS8OZI/OewDKBzVxdIh68+FePmKS/aefFGE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Iand7ozCIlzz9a8z5b3FZAwgcZbSpu93RagY9HYAeWpl+vHv8Vd6JP2lOHl1+3zf0i06C8wXjJczPhL0seSHtE=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:860a:: with SMTP id z10mr24058413ioj.35.1549041491473; Fri, 01 Feb 2019 09:18:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKaEYh+X_uj39OQNLy9O+aq1pbwYftbvyjx8TG0Y84wsw_ymoA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKaEYh+X_uj39OQNLy9O+aq1pbwYftbvyjx8TG0Y84wsw_ymoA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2019 02:17:45 +0900
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMDYrgL17X_rFtTrA10A-UrpRLYb4iPJM2RmJ2=b12Lx2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d77aa50580d85331"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/QGIE2pnVEWqPWeqPxdlC1C2i8yE>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Is TCP a URI scheme?
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 17:18:14 -0000

I don't believe it has ever been registered, even provisionally, but you
can find example syntax in both IBM and TIBCO documentation of their
usage.  See, for example:

https://docs.tibco.com/pub/activespaces/2.1.6/doc/html/GUID-CAE482DF-C20D-46C4-AD2D-337535551423.html

and

https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/HermannSW/entry/dp_url_open_with_tcp_protocol_and_non_xml_response15?lang=en

You may have to find the documentation for the config format to get a truly
clear answer on the intended syntax here.

regards,

Ted Hardie


On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 7:21 PM Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Apologies if this is the wrong list.
>
> I was wondering if TCP is a URI scheme (formally or informally).  I dont
> see it here
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/uri-schemes.xhtml
>
> Use case : I'm working with config in the lightning network and seeing
> config entries like this
>
> zmqpubrawblock=tcp://51.15.119..11:28332 <http://51.15.119.11:28332>
> zmqpubrawtx=tcp://51.15.119.11:28333
>
> If there's a better place to direct the question, Id be grateful to know.
> _______________________________________________
> Uri-review mailing list
> Uri-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email