Re: [Uri-review] Fwd: Protocol Action: 'Moving mailserver: URI scheme to historic' to Proposed Standard (draft-melnikov-mailserver-uri-to-historic-00.txt)

11.01.2011 2:26, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:

Dear Martin,

Please see 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/maillist.html 
where you can find some discussion on this topic.

As for the category, I really wonder how may the author claim that there 
are 2 independent implementations of such technology, per RFC2026 to 
move it to Draft Standard?

Mykyta
> Now that I see it right in front of my eyes, I'm quite a bit surprised 
> that this document is going to be a Proposed Standard. Was this 
> discussed before? Is there a plan to advance it to Draft Standard and 
> then Full Standard? Wouldn't Informational be good enough? Can this 
> still be fixed?
>
> [If this was already discussed, please ignore this message.]
>
> Regards,   Martin.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Protocol Action: 'Moving mailserver: URI scheme to historic' 
> to    Proposed Standard 
> (draft-melnikov-mailserver-uri-to-historic-00.txt)
> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:49:48 -0800
> From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
> To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
> CC: Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>,        RFC Editor 
> <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
>
> The IESG has approved the following document:
> - 'Moving mailserver: URI scheme to historic'
>   (draft-melnikov-mailserver-uri-to-historic-00.txt) as a Proposed
> Standard
>
> This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an
> IETF Working Group.
>
> The IESG contact person is Peter Saint-Andre.
>
> A URL of this Internet Draft is:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-melnikov-mailserver-uri-to-historic/ 
>
>
>
>
> Technical Summary
>
>    This document registers the mailserver: URI scheme as
>    historic in the IANA URI registry.
>
> Working Group Summary
>
>    This document is not the product of a working group.
>
> Document Quality
>
>    The document cleans out some cruft in the IANA registry
>    and clarifies possible confusion regarding the mailserver:
>    URI scheme, which was never put into use.  This topic was
>    discussed on the URI and Applications Area email lists, and
>    there was wide agreement that this document is helpful.
>
> Personnel
>
>    The Document Shepherd / Responsible Area Director is
>    Peter Saint-Andre.
>
> RFC Editor Note
>
>    Please add the following line to the document header:
>
>       Updates: RFC 1738
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>
>
>
>