[Uri-review] Request for review of new ipn: URI scheme

Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com> Wed, 16 February 2011 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCDAD3A6EE8 for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:38:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1PjH1mn-rkZC for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:38:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from auth.a.painless.aaisp.net.uk (a.painless.aaisp.net.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:0:30::51bb:1e33]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15183A6EE5 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:38:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 250.254.187.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.187.254.250]) by a.painless.aaisp.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>) id 1PpmHU-0004lA-Vm; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:39:17 +0000
From: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>
To: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:41:10 +0000
Message-Id: <1297881670.18417.1730.camel@mightyatom.folly.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:49:40 -0800
Cc: draft-irtf-dtnrg-cbhe.all@tools.ietf.org, uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: [Uri-review] Request for review of new ipn: URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:38:54 -0000

Hi.

The DTN Research Group has a draft being examined by the IESG for
approval as an Experimental RFCthat contains the specification of the
ipn: URI scheme:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-dtnrg-cbhe-08

We would like to request review of the scheme prior to approval of the
draft.

The original motivation for the definition of this scheme is usage of
DTNs in space-based networks where bandwidth is at a premium, but its
usage is not confined to theis application.

It has been observed by the responsible AD that the ABNF syntax in the
draft is faulty (it uses ':=' rather than '=' throughout.. it will be
replaced with:

ipn-uri       = "ipn:" ipn-hier-part
ipn-hier-part = node-nbr nbr-delim service-nbr ; a path-rootless
node-nbr      = 1*DIGIT
nbr-delim     = "."
service-nbr   = 1*DIGIT

We also need to specify the References for the scheme - the only
relevant reference is the defining draft, which will hopefully be an
experimental RFC shortly.

Regards,
Elwyn Davies
Document Shepherd