Re: [Uri-review] draft-wilde-sms-uri-19 remaining editorials
Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu> Sat, 24 October 2009 05:02 UTC
Return-Path: <dret@berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72753A68DE for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AK+9r1yRgHlt for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.ischool.berkeley.edu (bliss.ISchool.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.78.13]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E003A68C8 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.6] (75-101-1-224.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [75.101.1.224]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.ischool.berkeley.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n9O52ql8020753 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:02:57 -0700
Message-ID: <4AE28A76.7070502@berkeley.edu>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:02:46 -0700
From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alfred � <ah@TR-Sys.de>
References: <200910121035.MAA20028@TR-Sys.de>
In-Reply-To: <200910121035.MAA20028@TR-Sys.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 128.32.78.13
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, antti.vaha-sipila@nokia.com
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] draft-wilde-sms-uri-19 remaining editorials
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:02:49 -0000
hello alfred.
my apologies for the delay, and thanks for the comments.
> Please add the missing "of" :
> | for the definition of <unreserved> and <pct-encoded>, and the details
> ^^^^
done.
> vvvvvvvv
> | 5. If the URI contains of a comma-separated list of recipients
changed to "... contains a comma-separated ..."
> ---vvvvvv v
> | [...]. The SMS message MUST NOT contain any HTTP header
> | fields, only the form data. The media type is implicit. It MUST NOT
done.
> | certain SMS User Data header fields. Gateways that accept SMS
> v v ^^^^^^ v
> | messages (e.g., in e-mail messages or Web forms) and pass them on to
> | an SMSC SHOULD implement this kind of "firewalling" approach as well.
> ^
done.
thanks a lot and kind regards,
erik wilde tel:+1-510-6432253 - fax:+1-510-6425814
dret@berkeley.edu - http://dret.net/netdret
UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool)
- [Uri-review] draft-wilde-sms-uri-19 remaining edi… Alfred Hönes
- Re: [Uri-review] draft-wilde-sms-uri-19 remaining… Erik Wilde