Re: [Uri-review] URI scheme for postal addresses?
Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Wed, 26 July 2023 14:23 UTC
Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94ED3C1516FF for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 07:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.987
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.987 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VDKqux7OCC-9 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 07:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [IPv6:2a00:bd80:aa::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8A03C15109C for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 07:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1690381381; bh=hLQCQZryXl8Ye6S5stLBqBSUQiCMA6TdJTPcM82FddA=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZQ+HS1pze4N+AO8kVdnFBwAL4BOS9vjTMawGPYk1OLg+T2Kyk8WvVgkTY5nhKFqSp V0UyhYI6Nd2kcvITH7pTcOLI30O5z/gRtI4VmTS4l6RrKqJxPrxDGl+nQTzjhQkBY8 MlRDbjSkxb7Q+KEOkMDgTC00g8xz07MbkTjTR0hg=
Received: from [IPV6:2001:420:c0c0:1011::9] ([IPv6:2001:420:c0c0:1011:0:0:0:9]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-22ubuntu3) with ESMTPSA id 36QEN0Kw812621 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 26 Jul 2023 16:23:00 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------25eXxFiQUnN8I7BllYe1rLZ0"
Message-ID: <990495c4-a9e8-3f4f-af0c-c25148b90b7e@lear.ch>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 16:22:59 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Nicholas Humfrey <nicholas.humfrey@bbc.co.uk>, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
References: <DU2PR01MB8112C169AA2A3412F6E0F3FEC000A@DU2PR01MB8112.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
In-Reply-To: <DU2PR01MB8112C169AA2A3412F6E0F3FEC000A@DU2PR01MB8112.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/_IbIfC8-VY8-DPPGp8R48ims2-0>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] URI scheme for postal addresses?
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 14:23:23 -0000
On 26.07.23 15:21, Nicholas Humfrey wrote: > > Hello, > > In ETSI TS 102 818, in Appendix A there is a URI scheme for postal > addresses: > > https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/102800_102899/102818/03.04.01_60/ts_102818v030401p.pdf > > I was surprised to discover that this isn’t defined anywhere else. > > Is there any interest in defining this in an RFC? > Someone should first let the IAB know that this is an issue. I don't know if we have an ETSI liaison manager, but someone should give them a crack at doing the right thing. Eliot
- [Uri-review] URI scheme for postal addresses? Nicholas Humfrey
- Re: [Uri-review] URI scheme for postal addresses? Ira McDonald
- Re: [Uri-review] URI scheme for postal addresses? Eliot Lear
- Re: [Uri-review] URI scheme for postal addresses? Christian Amsüss
- Re: [Uri-review] URI scheme for postal addresses? Nicholas Humfrey