IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] The "acct" URI scheme

"Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com> Fri, 06 July 2012 03:22 UTC

Return-Path: <paulej@packetizer.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A3011E8073 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bw7Sg2wup9al for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dublin.packetizer.com (dublin.packetizer.com [75.101.130.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA89611E8093 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sydney (rrcs-98-101-148-48.midsouth.biz.rr.com [98.101.148.48]) (authenticated bits=0) by dublin.packetizer.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q663Mn0F012502 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Jul 2012 23:22:50 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=packetizer.com; s=dublin; t=1341544972; bh=BGOnLNPnxprcy0vj0CsjRTmSbZcPki/ZJgT3DzFb4SU=; h=From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=C8YxqfiqxUhOv+e2UEtSdIBjctxkx2X+QwWRQwIE0JDUfaqkadHY9vy6shRg7wzg/ k6FmYJQwgGYxcUt8PS/ecpk67OMMvotEaYNkitQDt0WXg24ZQ4ZKMeTTZhePTktgGc didITHKVLNTOAt2iwO3+4+PGv904vLfdNaCB44Ds=
From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
To: uri-review@ietf.org
References: <017901cd4d15$afefc230$0fcf4690$@packetizer.com>
In-Reply-To: <017901cd4d15$afefc230$0fcf4690$@packetizer.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 23:22:59 -0400
Message-ID: <080201cd5b26$a6856fa0$f3904ee0$@packetizer.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJKSIhVu9auiZH24EzP9FwTB1PImpYhu8wQ
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: jsmarr@google.com, 'Mike Jones' <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, "'Murray S. Kucherawy'" <superuser@gmail.com>, 'Gonzalo Salgueiro' <gsalguei@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] The "acct" URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:22:40 -0000

Folks,

The "acct" URI scheme was just moved out of the WebFinger draft and into its
own draft.  As you give further consideration to this scheme, please
consider it within the context of this draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saintandre-acct-uri

Cheers!
Paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:uri-review-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Paul E. Jones
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 1:46 AM
> To: uri-review@ietf.org
> Cc: jsmarr@google.com; 'Mike Jones'; 'Murray S. Kucherawy'; 'Gonzalo
> Salgueiro'
> Subject: [Uri-review] The "acct" URI scheme
> 
> URI Reviewers,
> 
> We are progressing work in the IETF on WebFinger.  As a component of that
> work, we have defined the “acct” URI scheme that we would like to
> register. The “acct” URI scheme was first proposed several years ago in
> the Internet community and already adopted in some implementations
> (including Google+), etc.  The specification attempts to formalize and
> finalize the WebFinger specification, including the “acct” URI scheme.
> 
> The URI scheme registration template  can be found in Section 12.1 of this
> draft:
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-appsawg-webfinger-06.txt
> 
> We kindly request that you review the proposed URI scheme.
> 
> We look forward to your feedback.
> 
> Thanks!
> Paul
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Uri-review mailing list
> Uri-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email