IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] URI scheme registration request - dchub

Fredrik Ullner <ullner@gmail.com> Sun, 13 October 2013 20:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ullner@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C5721F9C8E; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jrofiekQbTuU; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22a.google.com (mail-pd0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC4B21F9C70; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x10so6569853pdj.15 for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=sc5pMAUn5cD6zK9Jq8UC2BzGvW6d4fX1pA+PiLu5f5g=; b=rYok8WOEY0OXTRnonW08pscJPiFSAslAd85TH/QH1tPjfp3pLEH1uQpWyhGWtjvh+S AgLcx25tzA+M9jasLhZZaIythqVvRy0lp1sd6K0M3kF4eh4VDZr0Xs0/dU6vRB99JWn/ lqiqMhSkNdoYgPZ+1sNYtXxczRWXcXtm40tX+2nFxwLzzVVmT3zC4XiOElXZqONlVoHX Ipf24I5F6+yAknCpMRDAkqvLFUePTyov0y7GPzDtdmPZd9BhxlZA2tkWUOaouwxg2/X2 MX8wRNP3Xu+Gaf5FzUhjgjWaA91NB1HkC1blkMg98E+Rg6sWlZo9zafAPNyB1Ma+plzw HkOw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.149.231 with SMTP id ud7mr34544613pab.8.1381695537264; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.254.231 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOd=0fPV3d=xBt_BH4vsG5aN5rNqjbAAzrdvxFnzFPXv_xbQag@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOd=0fOPCgEwPWxOm3QDn=QKe8Rb8RmShn5sEL3iBS_z6aOUXg@mail.gmail.com> <512663B2.20809@tibco.com> <CAOd=0fPuFsoTCh0mcYt_vVi-=Y5Or4oNQT+BYpKZv1zop0vdHA@mail.gmail.com> <51278B10.10200@ninebynine.org> <CAOd=0fMyEVHgQnzZpoH3wXws+T30V5O82u13nFwA+A=4FwQbnQ@mail.gmail.com> <513CAD82.409@ninebynine.org> <513E26F5.9080207@tibco.com> <CAOd=0fNA3OFG0_AH1ga8auUUrs7PbxGq1srGxZiox1NWGwO8eg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOd=0fPV3d=xBt_BH4vsG5aN5rNqjbAAzrdvxFnzFPXv_xbQag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 22:18:57 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOd=0fP4tEBaLsBX3AUgpxr8oKq+msUntYu-dBs=atESRkbyMQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fredrik Ullner <ullner@gmail.com>
To: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b6d95d0afc0fa04e8a50fba"
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] URI scheme registration request - dchub
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 20:19:07 -0000

Hi,

Sorry, but I'm not sure if the previous link was correctly pointing to the
0.4 version, but here it is: <
http://nmdc.sourceforge.net/Versions/nmdc-uri-scheme-0.4.txt> (I blame
Gmail)


On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Fredrik Ullner <ullner@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> There is now a new version of the dchub URI scheme proposal at <
> http://nmdc.sourceforge.net/Versions/nmdc-uri-scheme-0.4.txt<http://nmdc.sourceforge.net/Versions/nmdc-uri-scheme-0.3.txt>>.
> The following changes have been made:
>
> * The "Applications/protocols" section revamped to be more generic, so it
> doesn't have to specify each implementation.
> * Changed from Permanent to Provisional; this is to make sure that the
> scheme will be accepted as a first step (possibly later filing a permanent
> one, if people find that the scheme provides ample information to deem it
> worthy of permanent status).
>
> For other (minor changes), please see the SVN.
>
> If people are satisfied with the current scheme specification, I will
> proceed to submit it to the appropriate IETF list.
>
>
> --
> Fredrik Ullner
>



-- 
Fredrik Ullner

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email