Re: [Uri-review] XMPP jabber: URI scheme not registered?
"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Thu, 29 November 2012 04:14 UTC
Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5413521E80B5 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:14:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.069
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.069 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.121, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, J_CHICKENPOX_66=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XUkGaNS-NPXm for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:14:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DCD21E80A6 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:14:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id qAT4EkTR018590 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:14:47 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 4b73_9d54_4f37f76a_39db_11e2_8bf1_001d096c5782; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:14:45 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.1]:43639) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S1619BB7> for <uri-review@ietf.org> from <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:14:47 +0900
Message-ID: <50B6E130.4030003@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:14:40 +0900
From: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
References: <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A70F75EE78@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <50B4F2F0.3050406@stpeter.im> <50B652A7.2030502@ninebynine.org> <50B65E7D.9050005@stpeter.im> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D1E371700C3@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <50B68BBA.1000302@stpeter.im> <50B69BF5.2040808@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <50B69BF5.2040808@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, "xmpp@ietf.org" <xmpp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] XMPP jabber: URI scheme not registered?
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 04:14:59 -0000
Hello Peter, On 2012/11/29 8:19, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > So here is the registration... > > ### > > URI scheme name. > jabber > > Status. > permanent > > URI scheme syntax. > The only allowable strings are: > - jabber:client .. > URI scheme semantics. > Strings of the form 'jabber:*' and 'jabber:*:*' were > used as XML namespace names during development of the > technology that became the Extensible Messaging and > Presence Protocol (XMPP). The scheme was never used > for any other purpose. The only namespace names > minted with this scheme are listed above. No other > strings were minted, and no other strings shall be > minted. Note that defining new URI schemes for XML > namespaces is now discouraged. The 'jabber' scheme > was defined before standard best practices emerged. > > Encoding considerations. > Encoded as UTF-8 within XMPP protocol streams. This is irrelevant. See http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4395#section-2.6. I would write this as following: Encoding considerations. None. All characters are within the characters allowed in URIs. You may also be able to add the note that Björn suggested here. Regards, Martin. > Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name. > Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP). > > Interoperability considerations. > The 'jabber' scheme must not be used to identify or > enable interaction with XMPP addresses; the 'xmpp' > scheme defined in RFC 5122 is to be used in such > cases. > > Security considerations. > See Section 13 of RFC 6120. > > Contact. > Peter Saint-Andre<stpeter@jabber.org> > > Author/Change controller. > XMPP WG<xmpp@ietf.org> > > References. > RFC 6120 > > ### > > Feedback is welcome. > > Peter > > - -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlC2m/UACgkQNL8k5A2w/vyA2ACgkKPJN21QgVYrmN8Sk6ZShLpz > 6BgAnAkyDYhv2/sbi4fcn3R2h/FmbZvj > =abXm > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Uri-review mailing list > Uri-review@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review >
- [Uri-review] XMPP jabber: URI scheme not register… Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] XMPP jabber: URI scheme not regi… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Uri-review] XMPP jabber: URI scheme not regi… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] XMPP jabber: URI scheme not regi… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Uri-review] XMPP jabber: URI scheme not regi… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Uri-review] [apps-discuss] XMPP jabber: URI … Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] [apps-discuss] XMPP jabber: URI … Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Uri-review] [apps-discuss] XMPP jabber: URI … Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- Re: [Uri-review] [apps-discuss] XMPP jabber: URI … Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] [apps-discuss] XMPP jabber: URI … Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Uri-review] [apps-discuss] XMPP jabber: URI … Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] [apps-discuss] XMPP jabber: URI … Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Uri-review] [apps-discuss] XMPP jabber: URI … Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] [apps-discuss] XMPP jabber: URI … Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- Re: [Uri-review] [apps-discuss] XMPP jabber: URI … Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Uri-review] [apps-discuss] XMPP jabber: URI … Barry Leiba
- Re: [Uri-review] [apps-discuss] XMPP jabber: URI … Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] [apps-discuss] XMPP jabber: URI … Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Uri-review] [xmpp] XMPP jabber: URI scheme n… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Uri-review] [apps-discuss] XMPP jabber: URI … Larry Masinter
- Re: [Uri-review] [apps-discuss] XMPP jabber: URI … Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Uri-review] XMPP jabber: URI scheme not regi… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Uri-review] [xmpp] XMPP jabber: URI scheme n… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [Uri-review] [xmpp] XMPP jabber: URI scheme n… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Uri-review] XMPP jabber: URI scheme not regi… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] XMPP jabber: URI scheme not regi… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Uri-review] [xmpp] XMPP jabber: URI scheme n… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [Uri-review] [xmpp] XMPP jabber: URI scheme n… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Uri-review] XMPP jabber: URI scheme not regi… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] [xmpp] XMPP jabber: URI scheme n… Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] [xmpp] XMPP jabber: URI scheme n… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Uri-review] [xmpp] XMPP jabber: URI scheme n… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] [xmpp] XMPP jabber: URI scheme n… Peter Saint-Andre