IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] [IANA #1273521] Registration request for "at" URI scheme

bnewbold@robocracy.org Thu, 01 June 2023 23:00 UTC

Return-Path: <bnewbold@robocracy.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7144AC151998 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 16:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nUuacTSCFEhS for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 16:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.robocracy.org (adze.robocracy.org [96.126.104.254]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B01AC1516E9 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 16:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from adze.robocracy.org (adze.robocracy.org [IPv6:2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:feb0:af1f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bnewbold) by mail.robocracy.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8818D9C89A; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 22:59:58 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 22:59:58 +0000
From: bnewbold@robocracy.org
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
cc: "iana-prot-param@iana.org" <iana-prot-param@iana.org>, "pfrazee@gmail.com" <pfrazee@gmail.com>, "bryan@blueskyweb.xyz" <bryan@blueskyweb.xyz>, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <PH7PR21MB387849D1F6841566D86DFBA2A349A@PH7PR21MB3878.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <8ef414c0-5f18-781b-50c9-7872785ddad2@robocracy.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1273521@icann.org> <8b8310fe-20d1-f58e-79b6-b0ac6955e6c@robocracy.org> <rt-5.0.3-1170961-1685657461-1271.1273521-37-0@icann.org> <PH7PR21MB387849D1F6841566D86DFBA2A349A@PH7PR21MB3878.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/vG2A3OFUmzhtf2P9PazrDOOPBec>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] [IANA #1273521] Registration request for "at" URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 23:00:07 -0000

Hi Dave,

What do you think of an addition like:

---

Disambiguation Note
   This URI scheme has no association with the 'at' command line utility for scheduling program execution.

---

--bryan

On Thu, 1 Jun 2023, Dave Thaler wrote:

> In my opinion it would be helpful to include a Note since this registration
> doesn't follow the "SHOULD" (which is ok since its not a MUST) in RFC 7595:
> "   Schemes SHOULD NOT use names that are either very general purpose or
>   associated in the community with some other application or protocol."
>
> since "at", is a well known (e.g., see https://linux.die.net/man/1/atapplication, https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-commands/at, etc.) application for scheduling job execution.
>
> It would be helpful to acknowledge this to avoid confusion.
>
> Dave

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email