IETF Logo Mail Archive

I18N Concensus - Generic Syntax Document

Rich Petke <R.PETKE@csi.compuserve.com> Thu, 06 March 1997 13:52 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa24959; 6 Mar 97 8:52 EST
Received: from services.Bunyip.Com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08477; 6 Mar 97 8:52 EST
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA15352 for uri-out; Thu, 6 Mar 1997 08:02:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA15347 for <uri@services.bunyip.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 1997 08:02:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from arl-img-6.compuserve.com by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA11720 (mail destined for uri@services.bunyip.com); Thu, 6 Mar 97 08:02:07 -0500
Received: by arl-img-6.compuserve.com (8.6.10/5.950515) id IAA28627; Thu, 6 Mar 1997 08:02:05 -0500
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 1997 08:00:42 -0500
From: Rich Petke <R.PETKE@csi.compuserve.com>
To: URI List <uri@bunyip.com>
Subject: I18N Concensus - Generic Syntax Document
Message-Id: <CSI_6317-123060@CompuServe.COM>
Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk

Comments on I18N issues in the generic URL syntax document seem to have ended.
Martin has edited his comments to reflect input from these discussions and
posted them at:

http://www.ifi.unizh.ch/groups/mml/mduerst/urli18n.html

Is there any more debate on the subject?  Does anyone else have comments,
contributions?

We really need to move forward on the Generic URL Syntax document!

Rich Petke (r.petke@csi.compuserve.com)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email