Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: procedural issue?
Christopher Walon Apple <capple@master.control.att.com> Tue, 04 February 1997 07:07 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa25330; 4 Feb 97 2:07 EST
Received: from services.Bunyip.Com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03659; 4 Feb 97 2:07 EST
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id BAA25702 for uri-out; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 01:55:19 -0500
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA25697 for <uri@services.bunyip.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 01:55:17 -0500
Received: from [135.205.52.13] by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA23034 (mail destined for uri@services.bunyip.com); Tue, 4 Feb 97 01:55:15 -0500
Received: by master.control.att.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0vreme-002iwoC; Tue, 4 Feb 97 01:55 EST
Message-Id: <m0vreme-002iwoC@master.control.att.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 01:55:00 -0500
From: Christopher Walon Apple <capple@master.control.att.com>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>, sollins@lcs.mit.edu
Cc: uri@bunyip.com
Subject: Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: procedural issue?
Content-Length: 925
Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk
Larry Masinter wrote: >x.500 doesn't have the equivalent of "relative URLs", does it? Sort of..... X.500/LDAP servers can be configured to have a server-root so that if a DUA does not (or cannot) include a search base, the server has knowledge from which it can construct a base distinguished name at which the search should begin in the directory information tree. I also recall that NDS (don't remember the version/release number, probably 3.X+) allows administrative and other users to use the concept of relative naming for directory objects when navigating the tree. So, while the notions of relative naming and object/resource locators may not be reflected in the X.500 Series of ITU Recommendations explicitly (my memory may be faulty as to how explicit these notions are), they are included in at least some of the implementations. Chris Apple Principal Technical Staff Member AT&T Laboratories capple@att.com
- Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: procedural issue? John C Klensin
- Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: procedural issue? Martin J. Duerst
- Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: procedural issue? Karen R. Sollins
- Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: procedural issue? Larry Masinter
- Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: procedural issue? Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: procedural issue? Christopher Walon Apple
- Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: procedural issue? Chris Newman
- Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: procedural issue? Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: procedural issue? Karen R. Sollins
- Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: procedural issue? Chris Newman
- Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: procedural issue? Martin J. Duerst
- Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: a way out? Larry Masinter
- Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: a way out? Martin J. Duerst
- Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: procedural issue? Susan Hardy for Tim BL