Self-censorship using URLs
Leslie Daigle <leslie@bunyip.com> Tue, 05 September 1995 15:20 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12329; 5 Sep 95 11:20 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12325; 5 Sep 95 11:20 EDT
Received: from services.Bunyip.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12052; 5 Sep 95 11:20 EDT
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id KAA00517 for uri-out; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 10:25:13 -0400
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA00512 for <uri@services.bunyip.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 10:25:11 -0400
Received: from beethoven.Bunyip.Com by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA20270 (mail destined for uri@services.bunyip.com); Tue, 5 Sep 95 10:25:10 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Leslie Daigle <leslie@bunyip.com>
Received: (leslie@localhost) by beethoven.bunyip.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) id KAA05136 for uri@bunyip.com; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 10:29:01 -0400
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 1995 10:29:01 -0400
Message-Id: <199509051429.KAA05136@beethoven.bunyip.com>
To: uri@bunyip.com
Subject: Self-censorship using URLs
X-Orig-Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk
The real shortcoming of building any kind of "censorship/rating tags" into a document or a URL is the fact that it can only support a single rating scheme across many cultures in a given country, and many more across the _world_. For example, resources about Darwinian evolution are going to be unacceptable to Flat-Earth Society members, but are probably considered "Educational", and/or "General" to the majority of the earth's population. Or, how do you define "acceptable amounts of flesh" displayed in a picture or video? In Canadian television, there are already examples of having to change content of a single television program (that was made for both English and French Canadian audiences) because the English population considered the French version too racy. And what about other cultures that consider North-American women's dress as being far too revealing? The only thing that can be accomplished in building tags into a document or a URL is ratings for a particular population's perception of the information space. Any rating system that purports to deal with rating in a general sense will have to allow different populations to rate the same document using different criteria and tags. The Internet-Draft draft-ietf-uri-urc-req-01.txt provides one proposal of a service that could accommodate this kind of rating system, and I'm sure there are others. Cheers! Leslie. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "I'm not napping, Leslie Daigle I'm redecorating my personal space." leslie@bunyip.com -- ThinkingCat Montreal, Canada ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Self-censorship using URLs Matthew C. Clarke
- Self-censorship using URLs Leslie Daigle
- Re: Self-censorship using URLs Ronald E. Daniel
- Re: Self-censorship using URLs Larry Masinter
- Re: Self-censorship using URLs Ronald E. Daniel