Re: Advice on NID for media fingerprint

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Mon, 25 April 2016 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF4712D520 for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.766
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.766 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74BiGB7c5Qng for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-po-10v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-10v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe16:19:96:114:154:169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9176B12D1C8 for <urn-nid@apps.ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-po-04v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.228]) by comcast with SMTP id ukf0akvu5ZjFtukh7aPjvE; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:53:13 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1461606793; bh=COxR9HFKuwIWqFCOdHxpE9Hs8GvJVdti3ujfH8jjXxI=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID; b=X46gVG8kSOiN9/yNrugrKa98q1UiQS0Yy76qKD0QhOLSU3iAc5EoD+IlUEZ2HP2Kt u8ttytZBg/hpZspBbxU1NTNP76yorwHflQ/Zn6WZc+G0AciHca1lwOXp1q7I5zCYgc 608fM1ur/qK+xnC/wb69KJBhzXw1ng4dKpaL1F9bPL79g7+Fy/c1t8IYxdBaK2I9Cl Pk+/lOVD5X0dIkXcGD6hV315aFUGbCOyeu+sR2LyrqLL/6Y0wETLytRZaOBd/1u3S9 1T+ItnCW8XU8mszWc3mI6PtEZ+0YGn8KbVF+tBxrjcCioBE8dV7UCYgGJMh6OMY0AP FyAKb6MI8QyIA==
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([73.143.237.82]) by resomta-po-04v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id mhtB1s0031nMCLR01htBAk; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:53:13 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u3PHrAgK016504; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:53:10 -0400
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u3PHrA5S016501; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:53:10 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley)
To: Jonas Oberg <jonas@fsfe.org>
Subject: Re: Advice on NID for media fingerprint
In-Reply-To: <20160413162211.GB10460@silk> (jonas@fsfe.org)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley)
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:53:10 -0400
Message-ID: <878u014ltl.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn-nid/GQYrx_HXawPpbtVDrf9qRylNsWo>
Cc: urn-nid@apps.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn-nid/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:53:14 -0000

Certainly the idea is interesting, but I'm not sure it qualifies as a
system of "names" -- in a sample of 100,000 images, 1% of the images had
the same blockhash as one or more other images.  (There are something
like 30 million images in Wikipedia, which would imply over 300,000
collisions.)

Dale