Re: Submission for urn namespace

Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com> Fri, 03 February 2006 19:21 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F56UP-00028v-6K; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 14:21:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F56UO-00028q-0p for urn-nid@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 14:21:00 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA01023 for <urn-nid@apps.ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:19:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from zeke.ecotroph.net ([69.31.8.124]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F56g1-0008U2-A1 for urn-nid@apps.ietf.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 14:33:01 -0500
Received: from [64.100.231.177] ([::ffff:64.100.231.177]) (AUTH: PLAIN leslie, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by zeke.ecotroph.net with esmtp; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 14:20:01 -0500 id 01588017.43E3ACE1.0000468F
Message-ID: <43E3ACFF.2010003@thinkingcat.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 14:20:31 -0500
From: Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Macintosh/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: fx.nuttall@cisac.org
References: <43DF3D82.4020603@cisac.org>
In-Reply-To: <43DF3D82.4020603@cisac.org>
X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by courier 0.52.1
X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: d6c15d82a53e26283536b4a751453103
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: urn-nid@apps.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Submission for urn namespace
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: urn-nid-bounces@apps.ietf.org
Errors-To: urn-nid-bounces@apps.ietf.org

For this request -- I am unable to find the document in the
IETF Internet-Draft repository.  Could you please provide
the exact pointer, or make sure to submit the document
there if you have not already done so[*].

Best regards,
Leslie.

[*] See http://www.ietf.org/ID.html


FX Nuttall wrote:
> Dear Sir, Madam,
> 
> You will find attached a formal urn submission form sent to you by 
> CISAC, Registration Autority for JTC1/SC29/WG11 (MPEG).
> 
> I remain at your disposal for any questions you may have.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> FX Nuttall
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>                                                                FX NUTTALL 
> Internet Draft                                                      CISAC
> Expires: July 2006                                       January 25, 2006 
>                                     
>  
>                                 
>                      mpegra URN Definition 
>                  draft-nuttall-urn-mpegra-01.txt 
> 
> 
> Status of this Memo 
> 
>    By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any applicable 
>    patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been disclosed, 
>    and any of which I become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with 
>    RFC 3668. 
> 
>    Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering 
>    Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that 
>    other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
>    Drafts. 
> 
>    Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months 
>    and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any 
>    time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference 
>    material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." 
> 
>    The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at 
>         http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt 
> 
>    The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at 
>         http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html 
> 
>    This Internet-Draft will expire on July 25, 2006. 
> 
> Copyright Notice 
> 
>       Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).  All Rights Reserved. 
> 
> Abstract 
> 
>    ISO JTC1/SC29/WG11 has published the MPEG-21 Digital Item Identification (DII)
>    standard (ISO/IEC 21000-3:2003). This part of the standard defines Digital Items
>    Identifiers as URIs. A registration Authority has been appointed to guarantee uniqueness
>    of the registered identfiers.
>    This document is the definition of the formal Uniform Resource Name (URN)
>    Namespace Identifier (NID) for DIIs.  
> 
> Conventions used in this document 
> 
>    The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", 
>    "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this 
>    document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  
> Nuttall                  Expires July 25, 2006                [Page 1] 
>  
> Internet-Draft           mpegra URN Definition            January 2006 
>     
> 
>     
> 
> Table of Contents 
> 
>     
>    1. URN Namespace Definition Template..............................2 
>       1.1. Namespace ID:.............................................2 
>       1.2. Registration Information:.................................2 
>       1.3. Declared registrant of the namespace:.....................2 
>       1.4. Declaration of structure:.................................3 
>    The identifier structure is as follows:...........................3 
>       1.5. Relevant ancillary documentation:.........................3 
>       1.6. Identifier uniqueness considerations:.....................3 
>       1.7. Identifier persistence considerations:....................3 
>       1.8. Process of identifier assignment:.........................3 
>       1.9. Process for identifier resolution:........................3 
>       1.10. Rules for Lexical Equivalence:...........................3 
>       1.11. Conformance with URN Syntax:.............................3 
>       1.12. Validation mechanism:....................................4 
>       1.13. Scope: Global............................................4 
>    2. Formal Syntax..................................................4 
>    3. Security Considerations........................................4 
>    4. Namespace Considerations.......................................4 
>    5. Community Considerations.......................................4 
>    6. IANA Considerations............................................5 
>    7. References.....................................................5 
>       7.1. Normative References......................................5 
>       7.2. Informative References....................................5 
>    Author's Addresses................................................5 
>    Intellectual Property Statement...................................5 
>    Disclaimer of Validity............................................5 
>    Copyright Statement...............................................5 
>    Acknowledgment....................................................5 
>     
> 1. URN Namespace Definition Template 
> 
>    The following template is provided in accordance with [RFC3406]. 
> 
> 1.1. Namespace ID: 
> 
>    mpegra 
> 
> 1.2. Registration Information: 
> 
>    Version: 1 
> 
>    Date: 2006 01 25 
> 
> 1.3. Declared registrant of the namespace: 
> 
>    Name:    CISAC (international Confederation of Societies
> 		of Authors and Composers)
>    Address: 20-26 Blvd du Parc, 92200 Neuilly sur Seine - France 
> 
>    Contact: Mr. Eric Baptiste, Director General 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  
> Nuttall                  Expires July 25, 2006                [Page 2] 
>     
> Internet-Draft           mpegra URN Definition           January 2006 
>     
> 
> 1.4. Declaration of structure: 
> 
>    The identifier structure is as follows: 
> 
>       URN:MPEGRA:DII:<ID> 
> 
>    Where <MPEGRA> is the target namespace for an mpeg registration authority.
>    The <DII> namespace will be assigned by CISAC to all registrants willing to 
>    use an identifier within the DII specification (ISO/IEC 21000-3:2003).
>    <ID> are RFC2141 conformant identifiers managed by a registration
>    authority and are further constrained by their repsective specification. 
>    Some Examples are : 
> 
>       URN:MPEGRA:DII:ISWC:T-034.524.680-1
> 
> 	In this example <ISWC> uniqueness is guaranteed by the JTC1/SC29 DII registration Authority (CISAC)
> 	and <T-034.524.680-1> is defined in [ISO15707], is compliant with RFC2141 and its 
> 	uniqueness is guaranteed by the JTC1/SC9 ISWC registration Authority (CISAC)
> 
> 	URN:MPEGRA:DII:ISRC:FR-Y03-03-00400
> 	In this example <ISRC> uniqueness is guaranteed by the JTC1/SC9 DII registration Authority (CISAC)
> 	and <FR-Y03-03-00400> is defined in [ISO3901:2001], is compliant with RFC2141 and its 
> 	uniqueness is guaranteed by the ISRC registration Authority (IFPI) and its affiliated members.
> 
> 1.5. Relevant ancillary documentation: 
> 
>    DII, its syntax, uses and its processes are defined in [ISO/IEC 21000-3:2003]. 
> 
> 1.6. Identifier uniqueness considerations: 
> 
>    Namespace uniqueness is guaranteed by the ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC29 DII Registration Authority. 
>    Uniqueness of subsequent identifiers is guaranteed by the respective Registration Authorities
>    dor these identifiers.
> 
> 1.7. Identifier persistence considerations: 
> 
>    Persistence is guaranteed by ISO Registration Authority processes.
> 
> 1.8. Process of identifier assignment: 
> 
>    The details of the assignment process are defined from time to time 
>    by the DII Registration Authority.
>    Registrants will contact the Registration Authority through a dedicated website
>    (http://www.mpegra.org). Registrants are required to provide a valid urn for use
>    of their identifier within the DII specificiation. Registrants will have the option
>    of using the <mpegra> namesapce to reference their identifiers.
>    Registrants may declare their own URNs (e.g. urn:ISBN as defined in [RFC3187].
>    The DII Registration Authority will ensure that registrants are compliant with 
>    [RFC2141] and provide processes to ensure identifiers uniqueness.
> 
> 1.9. Process for identifier resolution: 
> 
>    MPEGRA identifiers are resolved by a direct or indirect lookup within the 
>    respective Regsitration Authority of the registrants for <IDs>.
> 
> 1.10. Rules for Lexical Equivalence: 
> 
>    The MPEGRA-NSS and DII sub-namspace are unique by the nature of the 
>    mpeg DII registration authority.  The MPEGRA-NSS and DII are case-insensitive.
>    Upper and lower case characters are treated as identical. 
> 
> 1.11. Conformance with URN Syntax: 
> 
>    No special considerations. The syntax is fully conformant with 
>    [RFC2141]. 
> 
>  
>  
> Nuttall                  Expires July 25, 2006                [Page 3] 
>     
> Internet-Draft           MPEGRA URN Definition             January 2006 
>     
> 
> 1.12. Validation mechanism: 
> 
>    In most cases, check digits provide syntax integrity. Lookup is via online
>    and offline services provided by the respective <ID> Registration Authorities. 
> 
> 1.13. Scope: Global. 
> 
> 2. Formal Syntax 
> 
>    The DII reference XML sceham is published at 
>    http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd
> 
>    The following text specificies the formal syntax of DII. This syntax here
>    is derived from the syntax definition in [ISO/IEC 21000-3:2003], 
>    constrained to prohibit the space character as a separator. 
> 
> 
> <MPEGRA> 	::= <DII> ":" <ID> ":" <value>
> 
> <DII>		::= <upper> | <lower>
> <ID>		::= <let-num>
> <value>		::= <let-num> "-" <check>
> <check>     	::= <let-num>
> 
> Note: The exact syntax of <value> may vary from one identifier to another.  
> <let-num>, <upper> and <lower> are defined in [RFC2141].
> 
> 
> 
> 3. Security Considerations 
> 
>    This document only defines the syntax and resolution authority for 
>    the mpegra and DII namespaces. Details of the resolution process and 
>    the security of the assignment and resolution system processes are defined 
>    external to this document either by the DII Registration Authority or an <ID> 
>    Registration Authority and thus is outside the scope of this document. 
> 
> 4. Namespace Considerations 
> 
>    In order to ensure uniqueness of its identification Scheme, MPEG 
>    (ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC29/WG11) has designated CISAC as its Registration
>    Authority. DII beings URIs, by definition, CISAC needs to offer a unique
>    urn namespace for all entities wiling to use identifiers within MPEG-21.
>    
>    MPEGRA has been chosen as a generic namespace for an mpeg Registration
>    Authority. The DII namespace is used to clearly identify the urn as being
>    a Digital Item identifier
>    
> 5. Community Considerations 
> 
>    MPEG-21, of which DII is a part, is a multimedia framework, in the broadest
>    sense of the term. Contributors range from the Telecom, consumer electronics, 
>    media industries as well as academics.
>    DII being a Digital Item Identifier it is anticipated that it will broadly 
>    adopted by the media Industry.
>    
>  
>  
> Nuttall                  Expires July 25, 2006                [Page 4] 
>    
> Internet-Draft           MPEGRA URN Definition              January 2006 
>     
> 
> 
> 6. IANA Considerations 
> 
>    This document defines a URN NID registration that is to be entered 
>    into the IANA registry of URN NIDs. It specifically requests the NID, 
>    "MPEGRA". 
> 
> 7. References 
> 
> 7.1. Normative References 
> 
>    [RFC2141] IETF RFC 2141, URN Syntax, May 1997  
> 
>    [ISO/IEC 21000-3:2003] Information Technology — Multimedia Framework 
>    - MPEG-21 Part 3: Digital Item Identification.
> 
> 7.2. Informative References 
> 
>    [RFC3406] IETF RFC 3406, Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespace 
>    Definition Mechanisms, October 2002. 
> 
> Author's Addresses 
> 
>    FX NUTTALL
>    CISAC 
>    20-26 Boulevard du Parc
>    92200 Neuilly sur Seine
>    France
>        
>    Email: fx.nuttall@cisac.org
>     
> Intellectual Property Statement 
>    The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any 
>    Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to 
>    pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in 
>    this document or the extent to which any license under such rights 
>    might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has 
>    made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information 
>    on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be 
>    found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. 
> 
>    Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any 
>    assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an 
>    attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of 
>    such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this 
>    specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at 
>    http://www.ietf.org/ipr. 
> 
>    The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any 
>    copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary 
>    rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement 
>    this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at 
>    ietf-ipr@ietf.org.  By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that 
>    any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have 
>    been disclosed, and any of which I become aware will be disclosed, in 
>    accordance with RFC 3668. 
> 
>  
>  
> Nuttall                  Expires July 25, 2006                [Page 5] 
>     
> Internet-Draft           MPEGRA URN Definition              January 2006 
>     
> 
> Disclaimer of Validity 
> 
>    This document and the information contained herein are provided on an 
>    "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS 
>    OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET 
>    ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, 
>    INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE 
>    INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED 
>    WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. 
> 
> Copyright Statement 
> 
>    Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).  This document is subject 
>    to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and 
>    except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. 
> 
> Acknowledgment 
> 
>    Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the 
>    Internet Society.