[urn] URNbis document status
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Tue, 26 August 2014 00:22 UTC
Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A9C1A04E9 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.268
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.268 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0BU0PH6tdyQJ for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:22:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D64721A04C5 for <urn@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.115] (helo=JcK-HP8200.jck.com) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1XM4Wy-000IlA-WC; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:22:37 -0400
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:22:31 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Message-ID: <C537A9CB551C11FEFA3CF1E0@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.115
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/1K34zQ4wxrrxuc8N2fsrivHd2G4
Cc: urn@ietf.org
Subject: [urn] URNbis document status
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:22:42 -0000
Hi. This is mostly to Andy and Peter, but the WG should be aware that it has been sent. >From the tracker and some additional information, we now have, in no particular order: (1) draft-ietf-urnbis-semantics-clarif-00, described in a note I just sent: Awaiting posting approval from Andy. That approval should also tell the Secretariat to make it as replacing draft-ietf-urnbis-urns-are-not-uris (and the latter as being replaced). (2) draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-03: Just posted with fairly minor changes. While those changes are, I hope, improvements, the main reason from posting -03 was to prevent the draft from expiring this week. Once we reach consensus on it (assuming we eventually do), it should be identified as having superceded draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3044bis-issn-urn and draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3187bis-isbn-urn). (3) Definitions and syntax - 2141bis (draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-07): Expired (4) Namespace definition mechanisms - 3406bis (draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3406bis-urn-ns-reg-09): Expired. (5) NBNs (draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3188bis-nbn-urn-04): Expired spring of 2013 (we all know why, but shouldn't lose track of this as a work item). The last three are charter-identified documents, the other two are mostly just procedural. I hope we can see active versions of at least (3) and (4) Real Soon Now, if only because it is a little hard to work this way. best, john
- [urn] URNbis document status John C Klensin
- Re: [urn] URNbis document status Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [urn] URNbis document status John C Klensin
- Re: [urn] URNbis document status John C Klensin