[urn] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08: (with COMMENT)
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 02 August 2017 23:01 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: urn@ietf.org
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34094126B6E; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 16:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition@ietf.org, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, urnbis-chairs@ietf.org, barryleiba@computer.org, urn@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.58.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150171488920.5832.9826493259107180995.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 16:01:29 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/AM0VNcNCKahQD6j2r4PHMgg6Vbk>
Subject: [urn] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 23:01:29 -0000
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I have a different take on Adam's discuss point. I don't think its appropriate for this draft to both obsolete 3044 and 3187 and make them historical. This draft doesn't replace them. And since IANA may have to deal with a mix of old and new templates for some transition period, it doesn't remove the need for them. Instead, I think it would make more sense for this draft to just change their status to historical, but not obsolete them. And also mention that in the abstract :-) .
- [urn] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-u… Ben Campbell
- Re: [urn] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… John C Klensin
- Re: [urn] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [urn] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… Ben Campbell
- Re: [urn] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… Ben Campbell
- Re: [urn] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… John C Klensin