Re: [urn] Jari Arkko's Discuss on draft-martin-urn-globus-02: (with DISCUSS)
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Fri, 18 March 2016 14:09 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F49F12D5EA; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 07:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QI-T8KHM0QkN; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 07:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234CE12D556; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 07:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F75E2CCE2; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:08:45 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T6fLcUbI90mt; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:08:44 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EFA2CC9A; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:08:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_972EE63D-526A-4597-B21C-1FAFB7F59CDC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJK+GdJV9rosPvwGaqrFNdvDjm8SwBCwjQ6EC+aCou3cBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:08:45 +0000
Message-Id: <62788D8C-61EA-48CA-A283-981FD2663E59@piuha.net>
References: <20160317091843.6022.58207.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJK+GdJV9rosPvwGaqrFNdvDjm8SwBCwjQ6EC+aCou3cBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/Ik1tuPlCTA0zRKGlYRZseg5BTiw>
Cc: draft-martin-urn-globus@ietf.org, Joel Halpern <joel.halpern@ericsson.com>, "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [urn] Jari Arkko's Discuss on draft-martin-urn-globus-02: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:09:50 -0000
cleared On 18 Mar 2016, at 13:47, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > Jari, can you check that version -03 addresses your DISCUSS? > > Thanks, > Barry > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote: >> Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-martin-urn-globus-02: Discuss >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-martin-urn-globus/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> DISCUSS: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Thanks for writing this document. Before recommending its approval, I >> need to have a discussion with you about one aspect. Joel Halpern raised >> a question in his Gen-ART review: >> >> As per the pointer in this document to RFC 3406 section 4.3, this >> document is required to have a Namespace Considerations section which >> "outlines the perceived need for a new namespace (i.e., where existing >> namespaces fall short of the proposer's requirements)." While there is a >> section called Namespace Considerations, what it lists is the envisioned >> usages, not the reasons existing name spaces are insufficient. >> >> Is there an answer, or an update? >> >> I cannot imagine adding the requested rationale is difficult to add in >> this case, but it probably should be added. Thoughts? >> >> >> >>