IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [urn] Comments/answers to reasons for changes in PWID URN version 4 - diff version 3 and 4

"Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de> Thu, 17 January 2019 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC64129BBF for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 06:46:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2wS9GQNonfR3 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 06:46:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.dnb.de (prodfix-out0.dnb.de [193.175.100.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0EB8130E6B for <urn@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 06:46:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dnb-tmg.ad.ddb.de (tmg.dnb.de [10.69.66.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.dnb.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE8AE4980824; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:46:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dnb-tmg.ad.ddb.de (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BF0A4052; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:46:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dnb-tmg.ad.ddb.de (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A410A4041; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:46:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dnbf-ex.AD.DDB.DE (unknown [10.69.63.244]) by dnb-tmg.ad.ddb.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:46:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dnbf-ex.AD.DDB.DE (10.69.63.244) by dnbf-ex.AD.DDB.DE (10.69.63.244) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.1.669.32; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:46:41 +0100
Received: from dnbf-ex.AD.DDB.DE ([fe80::3576:7565:4f15:49c7]) by dnbf-ex.AD.DDB.DE ([fe80::3576:7565:4f15:49c7%4]) with mapi id 15.01.0669.032; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:46:41 +0100
From: "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>, Eld Zierau <elzi@kb.dk>
CC: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Re: [urn] Comments/answers to reasons for changes in PWID URN version 4 - diff version 3 and 4
Thread-Index: AdSuc3Sm32TiMBAVSZKSdHKbD7LiBA==
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:46:41 +0000
Message-ID: <0a8299a1afb643abb1466b4b0735c12c@dnb.de>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.69.12.174]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.1844-8.2.0.1013-24372.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--27.623-5.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--27.623-5.0-31-10
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.1844-8.2.1013-24372.000
X-TMASE-Result: 10--27.622900-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 6otD/cJAac2+/DppUgeV14Dqq/69HfgsTJDl9FKHbrkJW4Re2U2py6nt 4xKx7rcqpHkojTnLiX0AnJsVFdoN+baOw3xqC4q8hsE+u3nnCfCH7D1bP/FcOoe1w3/L9JY5345 +on9m5LpNYvDaO9t+nFxBgG7mg/DlfPmUQQG69pwA/YF+Wl3eH+D8QblN6KNVrvW2+LEIIhMhn8 yOd6dbI0/3QbfXts8P24m07etrO5R/dZAjNXEbFovNlIrJDKnM4GCn4bchfGvRYCdDmDnTy2Nok eyvFnLM88mAp1QEppWW5DYmFjD7MDUY01xhNnfIHPCema1j/6t9LQinZ4QefHlZfqMjiglXoeQz lhj3almNo+PRbWqfRJBlLa6MK1y4
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/M_B6GwC5jCL_rRbIIO7SVFJsafY>
Subject: Re: [urn] Comments/answers to reasons for changes in PWID URN version 4 - diff version 3 and 4
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:46:48 -0000

Apologies for not commenting on this draft until now...

Version 4 of PWID has matured considerably compared to version 3 and I think it needs at the most one or two more iterations until it's ready for registration.

I find the discussion about an IANA registry for names of web archives very interesting and would support the creation of such a registry. The number of such archives will probably be of manageable size (about the same size as the number of national libraries...).

I also have a number of minor editorial issues but would wait with those until the contents of the draft are more stable.

Best,

Lars

> -----Original Message-----
> From: urn [mailto:urn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dale R. Worley
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 2:02 AM
> To: Eld Zierau <elzi@kb.dk>
> Cc: urn@ietf.org
> Subject: [Marketing Mail] Re: [urn] Comments/answers to reasons for changes in
> PWID URN version 4 - diff version 3 and 4
> 
> Eld Zierau <elzi@kb.dk> writes:
> > Here is the promised Word file with differences between version 3 and 4
> 
> > [2:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
> Show Save:PWID_from_V3_to_V4.docx (81kB)]
> 
> Why not just give the URL to the datatracker's history page for the I-D:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pwid-urn-specification/history/
> and the URL for the diff between v3 and v4, in the format that basically
> everybody in the IETF is familiar with:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-pwid-urn-specification-03&url2=draft-pwid-
> urn-specification-04
> 
> Dale
> 
> _______________________________________________
> urn mailing list
> urn@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email