Re: [urn] IETF 87 Agenda

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 19 July 2013 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175D421E8050 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.565
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.565 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.034, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GvM5eAfeKnYC for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02ED311E80FD for <urn@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:32:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ergon.local (unknown [128.107.239.234]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E78904149B; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:33:54 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <51E97821.4020804@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:32:17 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
References: <CAAQiQReQNhRrZ_Ed3QGsTw4VD3vHeDPQvzwdfdU+KYOOUfZrNg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAQiQReQNhRrZ_Ed3QGsTw4VD3vHeDPQvzwdfdU+KYOOUfZrNg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [urn] IETF 87 Agenda
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:32:39 -0000

Hi Andy, thanks for posting this.

On 7/19/13 11:17 AM, Andrew Newton wrote:
> First, I want to thank everyone for the recent discussions. It looks
> like this working group is now making significant progress.

Indeed!

> Second, here is the preliminary agenda for IETF 87 in Berlin. We only
> have an hour, but a lot of what we need to discuss is finalization of
> the topics already covered on this list. Again, thanks everybody!
> 
> URNBis Working Group
> IETF 87, Berline, DE
> 08-02-2013 1120-1220 CEST
> 
> Agenda
> ------
> 1. Note Well and Agenda Bash
> 2. Discussion of draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3406bis-urn-ns-reg-06
>   a. Ready for WGLC?

I promised that I would investigate one issue further and propose some
text on the list. I will do that as soon as possible. We might even be
able to close that issue before the WG session.

> 3. Discussion of draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-05
>   a. Fragments
>   b. Queries
>   c. Equivalence

We've talked about removing Section 7. I haven't seen any objections to
that, but here again I will propose some text.

And naturally if people discover any additional issues, please raise
them on the list so that we can make sure we spend session time on
topics that require active discussion.

> 4. Any Other Business

I'll give some thought to more future-oriented topics.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/