[urn] Agenda for IETF 90
Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Fri, 11 July 2014 18:59 UTC
Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF4D1A0400 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61pDsKiihdQK for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com (mail-pa0-f47.google.com [209.85.220.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B97B1A036A for <urn@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id kx10so592789pab.6 for <urn@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AQ+RwyG6dfAdoKQNmngaRaZcmdDMj2XUPE0uhOloZME=; b=HQV3EEzomwO61oSFUNwqk84hAIyO685rwf0+z87ypDlyp1YfhnXUObv32+wCAZZdea mXeAB9xwHXpCkJVjihG98jL5bm3aUTc89s2TlhkQ1sy2hatkOnzBo9yZ95LOQWMZIZtt tPu/w6YROeknEQ9EaMcwY4vpXg8i/G9eAURfKMbrdiwekr/VyEDpNJbUVZGIcDhs/srr p1/HFRbp+LXT1l+O/C1udf0RYPH8Hm8jVNMapc5jQI7Y0qKR+dfd3vzbY0tFpqZ8cTOm Y4aL0hn2oWpvgTOn9y2A0hSsvIDvK5/A0xjjKjyYxR0ECcIBnD/yCESgTaZwLipF0d2V F7og==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnMBrzavg/ZdCT5Wv+tB9/zlLsHnZZmSkm85Wx1nyXr9EqwRjD/QD4tvT44ra3yK0TB3Uvm
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.65.14 with SMTP id t14mr699782pbs.164.1405105161672; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.9.2 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [192.149.252.11]
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:59:21 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAQiQRdUPA9Kgtugv-jSFnt9JK+NVsudwspqsnV5ph+XHkyAdg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
To: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/MuhqHgyg4Jhvy1keEvfPuxaRix0
Subject: [urn] Agenda for IETF 90
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 18:59:23 -0000
We are currently scheduled for Friday, July 25, 1150 - 1320.
1. Agenda Bashing
2. draft-ietf-urnbis-urns-are-not-uris
John Klensin
NOTE: The purpose of this session is to discuss the important topic
of separating URNs from URIs. Of specific interest are the following
questions:
1) Will allowing the use of the reserved characters ?’ and ‘#’ or
other expansions of syntax cause URN interoperability problems?
2) If there is no interoperability harm, is the approach to separate
URNs from the URI framework the currently-known, least-bad
approach?
3) If URNs are to be separated from the URI framework then how
should it be done?
3. Any Other Business
- [urn] Agenda for IETF 90 Andrew Newton
- Re: [urn] Agenda for IETF 90 Andrew Newton
- Re: [urn] Agenda for IETF 90 Martin J. Dürst