[urn] Different conceptual model compared to earlier specifications
"Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de> Wed, 21 December 2016 11:40 UTC
Return-Path: <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692EF129D5C for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 03:40:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UDSi68zqYKBb for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 03:40:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.dnb.de (prodfix-out0.dnb.de [193.175.100.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DBF6129D58 for <urn@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 03:40:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smg1.ad.ddb.de (unknown [10.69.63.232]) by mail.dnb.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E491947BC986 for <urn@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:40:17 +0100 (CET)
X-AuditID: 0a453fe7-171ff70000000f1b-c8-585a6a21f0d3
Received: from dnbf-ex1.AD.DDB.DE (dnbf-ex1.ad.ddb.de [10.69.63.245]) by smg1.ad.ddb.de (DNB Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id E9.74.03867.12A6A585; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:40:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from DNBF-EX1.AD.DDB.DE ([fe80::7076:30f7:60ad:16a0]) by dnbf-ex1.AD.DDB.DE ([fe80::7076:30f7:60ad:16a0%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:40:16 +0100
From: "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
To: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Different conceptual model compared to earlier specifications
Thread-Index: AdJbfv+Y2kM8v9YXR0+mKfRqfhWFIQ==
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:40:15 +0000
Message-ID: <24637769D123E644A105A0AF0E1F92EF010D2AA542@dnbf-ex1.AD.DDB.DE>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.200.69.97]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrALsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXC5Wr/VVcxKyrCYPEedYupzR+YHBg9liz5 yRTAGMVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CVMe+Nf8EProqvF3axNzBe4epi5OSQEDCR6Ju8haWLkYtDSOAw o8SVw3NZIZztQM7XXiCHnYNNQEvifQZIvYiAosS+Z03sILawgJvEltVdTBBxb4lvJ84wQth6 Et8OHgezWQRUJWbd3cUMYvMC1czraGQDsRkFZCU2bDgPFmcWEJfY9Ow7K8Q9AhJL9kDEJQRE JV4+/gcVV5DY82AbUC8HUL2mxPpd+hCtihJTuh+yQ4wXlDg58wnLBEahWUimzkLomIWkYxaS jgWMLKsY+Ypz0w31ElP0UlKS9FJSNzFCgvb5Dsa+Sy6HGAU4GJV4eJ/YREYIsSaWFVfmHmL0 52BSEuWd9BMoxJeUn1KZkVicEV9UmpNarCTC+zApKkKIFy6cVJqTrSTHK+UBFBWHixaXFhdk JmfmlxbHlxblHGKU4GAGas3KAGlNSaysSi3Khxh4iFGag0VJnPflPoYIIYH0xJLU7NTUgtQi mGwEB4eSBO9VkEbBotT01Iq0zJwSmDRQnxTINQLIMmAHKfIuCwJKSCFLoLuJiYPzEKMPBw/Q YeFghxUXJOYWZ6ZDzRbmnQkS5YGJgs2V5T3rDhQUgwmimnmKMVhKnPcBSJsASEVGaR7crVJi vEaF4RFC/EgSICOlFHhVWgMihCSRxFFNfcXoCYwiYd7lYOcAMwjCjUK8B0GC3FBBsBNleDlA cSEKFUM3ywcYtyK8C7vDQR4uSSxB9vAdd7CHoaJQD1+BeBgqiGqcVAPjKmWxtJ/K4XP8/Hlv mdR5aVY++GfIwRSfdipeWduyY+ZivmtLd+pOzNv7yH6qYoRhfPt9mcbZVuvn6bfVz2ISfMuZ oqdb3yb1zePByUWHW7PyJ/pOzZ5Q+f5r1QJRc54tHxmema2yVJqp+L2FjenHnkl75K8+qNpR yW0UsM1X2U92tatfiasSS3FGoqEWc1FxIgCfqQ9jQwQAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/ZrAh6ev7pcBSkwH4VudvM0sjJtI>
Subject: [urn] Different conceptual model compared to earlier specifications
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:40:20 -0000
All, in draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-18 the final paragraph of section 1 reads: [[ Summaries of changes from RFC 2141 and RFC 3406 appear in Appendix B and Appendix C respectively. This document obsoletes both [RFC2141] and [RFC3406]. While it does not explicitly update or replace [RFC1737] or [RFC2271], the reader who references those documents should be aware that the conceptual model of URNs in this document is slightly different from those older specifications. ]] This last reference to a "conceptual model [that is] slightly different" leaves the reader hanging in mid-air as to the nature of those changes. I think it would be helpful to supply at least one example of such a difference. Best, Lars *** Lesen. Hören. Wissen. Deutsche Nationalbibliothek *** -- Dr. Lars G. Svensson Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Informationsinfrastruktur Adickesallee 1 60322 Frankfurt am Main Telefon: +49 69 1525-1752 Telefax: +49 69 1525-1799 mailto:l.svensson@dnb.de http://www.dnb.de
- [urn] Different conceptual model compared to earl… Svensson, Lars
- Re: [urn] Different conceptual model compared to … Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [urn] Different conceptual model compared to … John C Klensin
- Re: [urn] Different conceptual model compared to … Peter Saint-Andre