IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [urn] NEW NAMESPACE REGISTRATION: KNX

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 05 September 2023 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5177C15106B for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 02:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.194
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.194 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmx.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N3lwMggCt8vn for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 02:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5313C151541 for <urn@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 02:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1693905358; x=1694510158; i=julian.reschke@gmx.de; bh=CQFwivAxsvsjDzzJHqwGXluIiz4oVI7RhOaFoBpyPLo=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=Q76ieBJV8vKfHUn2rr6NQnd2WlVH8bXkNWNdhvK1kDmvERz5W0SYlx2ifkRGaPW9CWf4yis pMVyC+brc+xGtSfo9soPEeymgEkMjyQVo4e3sxyGJqGJyTkXFU5cX0FUKnXcJc523PwYiHolh WKmZSCEpNr0baTyI7425wUjXi055FRSPWfINM9KfHJPxCVyT0v205+WImtkn6f1OhZQqX7Tz6 vf4w/epQpKj/e42L7jCBcuCh12uqyo+inlauc49d7QJYDy7M+MvXKg0mTNyH8VRZV6kzIIRv8 B/3UidHi4vlxD4qcFrYf4t0JaYanlopw7/syueLNo7PbY5FLD6Dg==
X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a
Received: from [192.168.178.182] ([217.251.133.103]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MirjS-1pybZS02po-00ewdE for <urn@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 11:15:58 +0200
Message-ID: <5e942fd0-e8e1-ac4b-5682-b6c8d099dc58@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 11:15:56 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: urn@ietf.org
References: <87v8cp93bv.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <dd749384-b2ba-4635-1ab5-84da235467e3@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <dd749384-b2ba-4635-1ab5-84da235467e3@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:iOYjZIS0tgjp15ZhqSuS3FejrOuRARXJ65jH8QgQvETdlA25raQ Yvmdn1SdMUuUJEYS5jSMrz3mYEMh36bEaeA93xjw7af2iMmRy+yk6zCV9ZO2RCI5QUBDX5l JPax/C56gNn9F1qBi14shbx+WyKKvzuPDt2n0ZYefLBlHoxFWmq3y9h+SoWh2cpigmQL7mH WsGAzw7vgYOM3y6Cg9y+A==
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:RjmJJYJb0Eo=;NbprWQViQpetfAZqoHVoqKcFz/2 tfdfetmtzshR6H9ZnLOdELwzbvDBrYh3ZL70oGCKunosjxquOsF9Ldeyp8C/PZ/lUVA5JDlz8 klsZ3V2wtlygOJqnoaygmQBprSdzN/ScC5FBgySWeEyu1ZnUu83UL4VL0EqdWi+GO//5i/pcX 8SIeoWWwhWuuMfSSxLYJHTi87wvQ5kDySNokL+IqVmDqQsXDGdYzyAE3DFPnyovja28baJ36N 6igrVdi3qCTzBluL/e37mT84JCgF/BDmMbrDilrErpripWQ3gLMADOI+64B8qzUu/EOKq99Vz YKrearFgmYjleIQAttf0pNjO2tp6LmKTZKFMI7uyKxN+5/RP8MKEaF4uZ1O07w4Mxv36JhNX0 W3POlssU4H2fOesTvoO+mE2GvunszfYgihdNnrYxD4xMNEytl2/NDn8AWbsI/1aPigS8v8Efz 2CaPmT9/z9RAz9i2PCDgDA9WVKr2cMNPW/0PgOQ3OeQRrRcCTfxc1PsrtXRfQA/jsJR/fAYPJ yzfeKkBU+NMDGRXWnMf/HJaRNgU1/8JC1FcxdOnlgTUKipzgLhMveYUK3JTGZV8n0/YddF03c dqmLBuitgiUrVnaZ25goriLjXXwwaG1JD5GCqjOjCH/sZLAyNTCD2Al50rVYu/+R/EphQcXmc rTFrTv4lZneVV8dJ/mEs87jQ0LUzm9X0Ra0mNGYkR22SN4fV6cfviH+vhTePK9Div40AViNbu zAY7mKty8KxlZ3km+Ll3HALb65O3fvKeMP8f0a2j0MDJaz2RrJvOyFGHgaftmBWNmP4IOLIzS mSd77VE95Gy2v/JvH9bEGEd6HUNk18k45ZMZ/+TuXbVf2kmvvxULRkQCMYiz1KTVdIif3RlL9 EEyTC/HVzplmaKPc2hFlNjPBxzKrh7ACFHsORDykQHclC/ROgZt328zJIA/3QJDSzInb1MGPt 0tMDng2+FMpuiouDYfvdV1UGdCM=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/djpNxr39H6BhtlQemX5qAA4JEyQ>
Subject: Re: [urn] NEW NAMESPACE REGISTRATION: KNX
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 09:16:04 -0000

On 05.09.2023 10:30, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
> ...
> I'm really concerned that starting to use the term "relative URN" in two
> different ways will cause I lot of confusion. I strongly suggest that
> the KNX spec do not use the term "relative URN". If it turns out that
> there's no good other word for the concept, at least make sure that it's
> always written "KNX relative URN", and that the spec clearly calls out
> the fact that this is different from "relative URN".
> ...

FWIW, what *is* a relative URN?

A relative reference to be resolved against a base URI that happens to
be a URN?

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email