[urn] Some initial thoughts on draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3188bis-nbn-urn-02

Bengt Neiss <bengt.neiss@kb.se> Tue, 24 January 2012 10:42 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=03703817f0=bengt.neiss@kb.se>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2009E21F8517 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:42:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_31=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ihaTihYBJYE for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:42:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mspkb002.kb.se (mspkb002.kb.se [193.10.72.137]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDAC21F8514 for <urn@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:42:44 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: mspkb002.kb.se header.from=bengt.neiss@kb.se; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
From: Bengt Neiss <bengt.neiss@kb.se>
To: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Some initial thoughts on draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3188bis-nbn-urn-02
Thread-Index: AczahKs/+ZCmcE2iQ7q+NjATeeTCaA==
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:42:40 +0000
Message-ID: <F52230A186DA59469E8E21CF80FE6D4D0F23DF06@SRVVM305.kb.local>
Accept-Language: sv-SE, en-US
Content-Language: sv-SE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F52230A186DA59469E8E21CF80FE6D4D0F23DF06SRVVM305kblocal_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received-SPF: none
Subject: [urn] Some initial thoughts on draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3188bis-nbn-urn-02
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about possible revisions to the definition of Uniform Resource Names <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:42:46 -0000

Hello all..

Just some initial thoughts on the new text...


1.       In chapter 4.2. "Encoding Considerations...." the expressions "primary prefix" as well as "secondary prefix" are introduced. I think we need to rephrase this since "prefix" is the expression used otherwise in text. As it is written now there is a sentence that states that the NSS consists of three parts and then there is a list with four "parts"... (might be better as "primary part of prefix", " secondary part of prefix" which occurs in occurs in other places text). I think it should be similar to the text in "Declaration of syntactic structure..." on page 12 - 13.


2.       The sentence "Future NBN implementations SHOULD make the NBN string case insensitive as well". Is this a relevant statement?
Since it seems to be that the nbn_string may be case-sensitive depending on syntax applied locally (ie. already implemented) and URN:s are persistent the case-sensitivity of the nbn_string must always be taken into consideration...



3.       I think there is a need to work further on defining restrictions or evaluate the consequences of the current text. Will make a new post on some issues  later..



Regards

//Bengt



---------------------------------------------------------
Bengt Neiss
Kungl. Biblioteket / National Library of Sweden
Phone: +46 (0)10 709 35 41