Re: [urn] draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition

 From my perspective, this one is okay. I did not find any nits to pick, 
other than that the document seems mostly to be a matter of housekeeping 
for existing registrations (and I cannot think of any additional 
registrations to update).

However, this document raises a novel issue in my mind, which I will 
spin up under a separate thread.

Sean

On 2/7/2016 2:34 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-06 is now in the posting
> queue.  As compared to the previous version, it has updated
> references, an explicit reference to the IANA URN namespace
> registry, and some minor editorial tuning.
>
> We will eventually need to come back to this document after the
> 2141bis registration template is complete (see prior note about
> reviewing that template in 2141bis-15) and we are ready to move
> forward, but probably time can be better spent now than on
> review this document.  The one important exception is that, if
> anyone has (or knows of) existing registrations that could
> usefully be changed to reflect the new model, this would be the
> right time to start thinking about them, if only because minor
> patches could be made as part of this I-D without requiring new
> documents.
>
>       john
>
> _______________________________________________
> urn mailing list
> urn@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn