Re: [urn] 3406bis: experimental namespaces

SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 31 March 2011 22:53 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: urn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26B428C10D for <urn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.453
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.453 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.146, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O+w6anZg+FXy for <urn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (eland-1-pt.tunnel.tserv15.lax1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:c:d43::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1F63A67EE for <urn@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.4/8.14.5.Beta0) with ESMTP id p2VMtCYF015042; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1301612122; bh=imid1Q2O6fWFOLApW7OUsqTjcwRH6mT+2xgs4EC5Ik4=; h=Message-Id:X-Mailer:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To: References:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=XxFVFwf6PtpMUjuWu/sV3mX3uYBc/vcN0qtt8J3ACqdzQc/PeGaBPuNvrpVN09jry BuB4+3APP2U3UBtHu9djCvKaHZ9UBkfOk2YebFew0iHH77fzQXLs5BvlnSBFQFUYss kFd1m9fvG2U3mh4Vjr+b1tUSXc5pPuPdQVRYoqSk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1301612122; bh=imid1Q2O6fWFOLApW7OUsqTjcwRH6mT+2xgs4EC5Ik4=; h=Message-Id:X-Mailer:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To: References:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=zilmPEmK6HitWJxqV2slpXFyIIWMs00MkGGR4Et/B6AM/mqQGGnMvYqYalf8iri6D fxfPOn1Pyfiu3MmzXtcxaQm+arlndBrUEwBV0xTpKDsdLhxKOP8xmafbCiPzDKqENm fbGO5PjEod5H6cUvsnqTdT/9DxtBmtg/oCeMBF+Q=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20110331153042.09d128a8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:31:54 -0700
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4D946CB5.9060100@stpeter.im>
References: <4D946CB5.9060100@stpeter.im>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: urn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [urn] 3406bis: experimental namespaces
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about possible revisions to the definition of Uniform Resource Names <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:53:47 -0000

Hi Peter,
At 04:59 31-03-2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
><hat type='individual'/>
>
>Regarding the discussion just now in the IETF 80 session about
>experimental namespaces ("X-<NID>"), I wonder if it would make sense to
>register a formal namespace "example" so that people who want to
>experiment can do so under "urn:example:*".

See draft-saintandre-xdash-considered-harmful

Regards,
-sm