[urn] The namespace registration trainsition draft, version 04

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Mon, 16 February 2015 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA951A6F10 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:58:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id syDbYZ1hfh3Z for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:58:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D4601A88BD for <urn@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:58:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.252.137.35] (helo=JcK-HP8200.jck.com) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1YNTga-000Isf-1k for urn@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:58:36 -0500
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:58:30 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: urn@ietf.org
Message-ID: <F50740CEF6CEA4D4522F4F9B@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.35
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/npNw-1iXPIoKyxPqdCraqXY-aHQ>
Subject: [urn] The namespace registration trainsition draft, version 04
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 21:58:45 -0000

Hi.

As the last of this round of document postings, I've just
submitted draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition.

For those familiar with prior versions, there are really no
substantive changes.  The major ones reflect the transition from
a separate 3406bis to the consolidated 2141bis.  So it is
probably reasonable to look at a diff.

I have also made a number of editorial changes that, I hope,
will make the document somewhat more precise.

In addition to a general review of the draft, WG participants
should note that the placeholder "[[CREF3" in Section 2
effectively asks a substantive question about whether there is
content in the now-expired draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3187bis-isbn-urn
and draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3044bis-issn-urn that needs to be moved
into either this documents or 2141bis.  If such content is not
identified soon, we will assume the answer is "no" and will
remove the placeholder.

The immediately-following "[[CREF4" ask a similar question about
other registered namespaces that might need specific transition
information.  Again, if there are such issues, please comment
soon or the placeholder will simply be removed.

Note that these placeholders have now been present in versions
of this document for well over a year and there have been no
comments in response to either.

best,
   john