[URN] draft-fielding-uri-syntax-00
Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> Fri, 31 October 1997 05:14 UTC
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA25819 for urn-ietf-out; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 00:14:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA25809 for <urn-ietf@services.bunyip.com>; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 00:14:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from spot.cs.utk.edu (SPOT.CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.92.189]) by mocha.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA18063; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 00:14:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cs.utk.edu by spot.cs.utk.edu with ESMTP (cf v2.11c-UTK) id AAA24872; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 00:14:14 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199710310514.AAA24872@spot.cs.utk.edu>
X-URI: http://www.cs.utk.edu/~moore/
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu>
cc: uri@bunyip.com, moore@cs.utk.edu, urn-ietf@bunyip.com, timbl@w3.org, masinter@parc.xerox.com, Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no, lassila@w3.org, swick@w3.org, tbray@textuality.com, jeanpa@MICROSOFT.com, cmsmcq@uic.edu, dsr@w3.org, lehors@w3.org, ij@w3.org
Subject: [URN] draft-fielding-uri-syntax-00
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 30 Oct 1997 22:50:10 CST." <34596382.4934@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 00:14:13 -0500
Sender: owner-urn-ietf@Bunyip.Com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Errors-To: owner-urn-ietf@Bunyip.Com
Roy, http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/url/uri.txt mostly looks okay to me. I think the URN people will want slightly different language to distinguish between URLs and URNs: e.g. URNs are distinguished not only because there is an extra resolution step, but also in the rules for assignment and use that are designed to make them more likely to be suitable as long-term identifiers. In the section on relative URIs, you might want to explicitly say that some schemes do not use relative URIs. But that's all I found on a quick glance-through. If you can tweak the URN description slightly, I'd say ship it. Would one of the URN group chairs or authors be willing to suggest, by private mail to Roy, appropriate wording changes? Keith
- [URN] Re: draft-fielding-uri-syntax-00 Leslie Daigle
- [URN] draft-fielding-uri-syntax-00 Keith Moore
- [URN] Just what I'm looking for! [was: The UR* sc… Dan Connolly
- [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL/URI… dlaliberte
- Re: [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL… Michael Mealling
- Re: [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL… Roy T. Fielding
- [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL/URI… Roy T. Fielding
- [URN] Re: development track for "where-it-says" [… Dan Connolly
- [URN] development track for "where-it-says" Al Gilman
- Re: [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL… Larry Masinter
- [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL/URI… Keith Moore
- Re: [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL… Michael Mealling
- [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL/URI… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL… Leslie Daigle
- [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL/URI… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL… Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL/URI… Keith Moore
- [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL/URI… Dan Connolly
- [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL/URI… Larry Masinter
- [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL/URI… Dan Connolly
- Re: [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL… Larry Masinter
- [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL/URI… Leslie Daigle
- [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL/URI… Leslie Daigle
- [URN] Re: draft-fielding-uri-syntax-00 Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL… dlaliberte
- Re: [URN] Re: The UR* scheme registry, Citing URL… Dave Raggett