Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5537 (1980)
Julien ÉLIE <julien@trigofacile.com> Tue, 29 December 2009 08:41 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEE23A69B9 for <ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:41:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.224, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fH3Sgah9xe0J for <ietfarch-usefor-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:41:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (Balder-227.Proper.COM [192.245.12.227]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14B63A6977 for <usefor-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:41:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id nBT8e75n065446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:40:08 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id nBT8e772065445; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:40:07 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from 39.mail-out.ovh.net (39.mail-out.ovh.net [213.251.138.60]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id nBT8e5w4065436 for <ietf-usefor@imc.org>; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:40:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from julien@trigofacile.com)
Received: (qmail 3154 invoked by uid 503); 28 Dec 2009 20:43:02 -0000
Received: from b7.ovh.net (HELO mail643.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.57) by 39.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 28 Dec 2009 20:43:02 -0000
Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 28 Dec 2009 20:42:28 -0000
Received: from amontpellier-159-1-14-25.w90-57.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO Iulius) (julien%trigofacile.com@90.57.85.25) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 28 Dec 2009 20:42:27 -0000
Message-ID: <06466FD87F5347558C8C6314998443E0@Iulius>
From: Julien ÉLIE <julien@trigofacile.com>
To: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>, Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, chl@clerew.man.ac.uk, lisa.dusseault@gmail.com, alexey.melnikov@isode.com, harald@alvestrand.no, ietf-usefor@imc.org
References: <200912282024.VAA13636@TR-Sys.de> <871viebzzi.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
In-Reply-To: <871viebzzi.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5537 (1980)
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:42:38 +0100
Organization: TrigoFACILE -- http://www.trigofacile.com/
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18005
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18005
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 1743456007616658739
X-Ovh-Remote: 90.57.85.25 (amontpellier-159-1-14-25.w90-57.abo.wanadoo.fr)
X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net)
X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-usefor/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-usefor-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-usefor.imc.org>
Hi Russ,
Maybe I should re-ask, before the verification takes place...
Didn't the mails I sent for errata 1979, 1980 and 1982 reach you?
> Given this, I agree with all the changes you propose and think the errata
> should be verified in its entirety.
If the erratum is to be verified, be sure to also include the fourth paragraph
of Section 3.4. It should also be amended:
predating this specification do not add an Injection-Date header.
"field" is missing.
Another thing: why is it "header field value" and not "header field body"?
RFCs 5322 and 5536 define "header field body" but not "header field value".
Where is the terminology drawn?
--
Julien ÉLIE
« Plus un ordinateur possède de RAM, plus vite il peut générer
un message d'erreur. »
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5537 (1980) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5537 (1980) Russ Allbery
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5537 (1980) Alfred Hönes
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5537 (1980) Russ Allbery
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5537 (1980) Julien ÉLIE
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5537 (1980) Julien ÉLIE
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5537 (1980) Russ Allbery
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5537 (1980) RFC Editor