Re: Empty backlog
Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> Fri, 12 January 2007 03:59 UTC
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H5DZe-0000s7-LS for usefor-archive@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:59:26 -0500
Received: from balder-227.proper.com ([192.245.12.227]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H5DZd-0003xs-86 for usefor-archive@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:59:26 -0500
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l0C3vKRc023949 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:57:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id l0C3vKUE023948; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:57:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from smtp3.stanford.edu (smtp3.Stanford.EDU [171.67.20.26]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l0C3vJMi023942 for <ietf-usefor@imc.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:57:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from rra@stanford.edu)
Received: from smtp3.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 706114BFDF for <ietf-usefor@imc.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:57:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.19.147]) by smtp3.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A1C4BFCC for <ietf-usefor@imc.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:57:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2534EE78F5; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:57:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
To: ietf-usefor@imc.org
Subject: Re: Empty backlog
In-Reply-To: <JBKFxp.1AL@clerew.man.ac.uk> (Charles Lindsey's message of "Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:08:13 GMT")
Organization: The Eyrie
References: <87ac0uuyv9.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <JBKFxp.1AL@clerew.man.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:57:19 -0800
Message-ID: <87r6u0yk0w.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-usefor/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-usefor-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-usefor.imc.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a
Charles Lindsey <chl@clerew.man.ac.uk> writes: > I also was also hoping for some response from you to: > Re: Injection-Date and reinjection > <JBAvC3.9tF@clerew.man.ac.uk> Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:04:51 GMT I think it would be useful for someone else to weigh in here, as you apparently find my analysis unpersuasive and I find your analysis unpersuasive. Nothing in your message changed anything about my opinion, and I'm not sure I have much more to say, but if other people discuss the parts that they find unclear, perhaps I'll see more to discuss. You should probably open this as an issue. > Re: Path header field > <JB7JBp.EtB@clerew.man.ac.uk> Mon, 1 Jan 2007 20:52:37 GMT I don't agree. I'm not sure that I have anything more specific to say. > Re: Approved header field content (was: Protocol changes in draft-allbery-usefor-usepro-00) > <JB9AqL.3M2@clerew.man.ac.uk> Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:42:21 GMT I don't have anything more to say on this one that I haven't already said. I'd just be repeating myself. -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Empty backlog Russ Allbery
- Re: Empty backlog Charles Lindsey
- Re: Empty backlog Russ Allbery
- Re: Empty backlog Charles Lindsey