Re: [Uta] New I-D on VC and TLS

Hi Stephen, before contacting UTA WG we have shared the I-D with TLS WG chairs, and they explained that typically defining a new credential type is not something that has been of interest to the TLS WG.

@UTA chairs - Could you please advise on the process to follow? 

Regards,
AV

> On 20 Feb 2024, at 17:41, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hiya,
> 
> I had a quick flick look at the draft. ISTM that's
> one that'd need processing by the TLS WG and not
> UTA. (Even if you disagree with that, you may agree
> that it'll be better to give the TLS WG a heads-up
> as someone there is bound to dislike this and it'll
> be better to know that sooner rather than later:-)
> 
> Cheers,
> S.
> 
> PS: I'm not sure I like the idea of the kind of
> OCSP-like lookaside for checking credentials, from
> the privacy POV.
> 
>> On 19/02/2024 08:57, Andrea Vesco wrote:
>> L.Perugini and I have written an I-D on the use of Verifiable Credential (VC) as a new means of authentication in TLS.  We think it might be of interest and in the scope of the UTA WG.
>> Could you please give us your opinion?
>> Draft
>> Datatracker https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vesco-vcauthtls/
>> Github https://github.com/Cybersecurity-LINKS/draft-vesco-vcauthtls
>> Kind Regards,
>> Andrea Vesco
>> _______________________________________________
>> Uta mailing list
>> Uta@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
> <OpenPGP_0xE4D8E9F997A833DD.asc>