[Uta] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog-05: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 22 April 2024 11:37 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: uta@ietf.org
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3ABC14F694; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 04:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog@ietf.org, uta-chairs@ietf.org, uta@ietf.org, kent+ietf@watsen.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.10.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <171378586804.56129.12629674209182177616@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 04:37:48 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/JJQW5oAxR_jfOtRjPcBSDo6FeQ8>
Subject: [Uta] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 11:37:48 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the work done in this document.

Abstract (and section 1): s/The Syslog Working Group published/The IETF
published/

Section 1: what is "out-of-date" in `the use of out-of-date TLS/DTLS versions`
? TLS 1.2 is not yet obsolete. Suggest to use "not recent" or "not the latest".
Does this qualification collide with `Implementations of [RFC5425] MUST
continue to use TLS 1.2` of section 4 ?