Re: [Uta] I-D Action: draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-04.txt

[Yaron Sheffer <[e-mail]>]

Dear UTA members,

 

We just submitted -04 of rfc7525bis which includes just one change from -03. There is now exactly one open issue [1] against this draft. The authors believe the draft is stable now and request the chairs to initiate a WGLC.

 

People who are following the draft closely might want to review the latest few issues: #249, #252, #253, #255, #256, #257. Specifically, [2] for reasoning about ServerHello.Random in TLS 1.2, and [3] on protocol layering.

 

Thanks,

                Peter, Thomas and Yaron

 

[1] https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3ABCP195" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3ABCP195

[2] https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/issues/252" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/issues/252

[3] https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/issues/257" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/issues/257

 

 

 

On 11/23/21, 00:54, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]> wrote:

 

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.

This draft is a work item of the Using TLS in Applications WG of the IETF.

 

        Title           : Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)

        Authors         : Yaron Sheffer

                          Ralph Holz

                          Peter Saint-Andre

                          Thomas Fossati

                Filename        : draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-04.txt

                Pages           : 35

                Date            : 2021-11-22

 

Abstract:

   Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security

   (DTLS) are widely used to protect data exchanged over application

   protocols such as HTTP, SMTP, IMAP, POP, SIP, and XMPP.  Over the

   last few years, several serious attacks on TLS have emerged,

   including attacks on its most commonly used cipher suites and their

   modes of operation.  This document provides recommendations for

   improving the security of deployed services that use TLS and DTLS.

   The recommendations are applicable to the majority of use cases.

 

   This document was published as RFC 7525 when the industry was in the

   midst of its transition to TLS 1.2.  Years later this transition is

   largely complete and TLS 1.3 is widely available.  Given the new

   environment, we believe new guidance is needed.

 

 

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis/" rel="nofollow">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis/

 

There is also an HTML version available at:

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-04.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-04.html

 

A diff from the previous version is available at:

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-04" rel="nofollow">https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-04

 

 

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:

ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/" rel="nofollow">ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

 

 

_______________________________________________

Uta mailing list

[e-mail]

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta" rel="nofollow">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta