IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Uta] UTA at IETF 115?

Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 21 September 2022 14:12 UTC

Return-Path: <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA2CC14CF0F; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G39qBtuM7wXX; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:12:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53D4EC14F747; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:12:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id u18so9423413lfo.8; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:12:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-language:thread-index:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date; bh=S97wQQerMdYb2SYRXjLUss1jiJNtNrmiVwBtBX2Q9lE=; b=J3mw5In9v8PzK5Ezs5LLWwBGZ4adimANaY/wIYGrU0wLk8ZttHNp9l/Ps1rL0iIdwO SRTABnQ7y9D3xG4Bjh5d8t7joUfJ2/JTZOG8XwJJrFI8raHtaEg7zL/xnERMxZ27r89Z yl0BQBBylt+XhVAqagumBH0iqC8izhjz5drty87/CahNaCJ+xG68Jpsxrgp/NwPGYB1Q gzRwgxPcWeC3SpZ9aDWUFQo3WDmUAu8cgGhCnLqTETyl5s1IIMdIAm6vTnc8OC/T/zll /peG3l236u7Xv8ZpGXxYDDONIzv1C/MsmocmBdqphCzltr9QWwusdGYBm19jWEf/ndoH pzkg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-language:thread-index:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=S97wQQerMdYb2SYRXjLUss1jiJNtNrmiVwBtBX2Q9lE=; b=ujcCLIcX/wmS5A8aHkwy9VMoDlYUkLkhFim3bdhmGOalGt27ElQGRptZDS17jFV6AR obxJnD9MfuYN5FXVnXOS/eovTNehZ2/fTTT7spT6468yopd11wdwA8/IyG+HCfxBUt/E VvpcLec9dR8ksi25g3ji/RaK1mq25WJpjv52FZscuKYNtMzrnBwIRDWnLLC+dZgsRkYL Fgw98GSHivc/GGdLTDUlNlTa7zFIZqMpvNWfn36ddIrzWXerkf668gf8CKy5IsH3CC2q 24k5X9zo2IOI3YLJA3ePgLO6HyAwh/afs9znn9R/zfhHot77nhL8YbvfkpTVnRkpT41Y wgLg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0BjhQnkUWQ6NxRxR8M3tXStSzaL6D4hUZtkrGgUcfBYWGYBtO8 M3I0DlAcOm6PISs8u0pTVgxy/MQDAXo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5AxHP47pkFcB4prMW0Rhm36gZUP5AlyN8KdQHAZEVR46Jh0jW8NRSlN51NfgSyFzCsmG8qlA==
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5451:0:b0:49e:bc93:3395 with SMTP id d17-20020ac25451000000b0049ebc933395mr11221135lfn.392.1663769557195; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from buildpc ([93.188.44.204]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t12-20020a056512068c00b00498fe38ea0fsm447021lfe.174.2022.09.21.07.12.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
To: uta@ietf.org
Cc: uta-chairs@ietf.org, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 17:12:36 +0300
Message-ID: <06e601d8cdc4$34356bf0$9ca043d0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdjNwthHaKDUZrv4QUSZDoJdneNe7A==
Content-Language: ru
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/TAXsVpLqpuFIqGmef1QG5ulJZkU>
Subject: [Uta] UTA at IETF 115?
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 14:12:42 -0000

Hi all,

the chairs are unsure whether to request a session for UTA at IETF 115.
It seems to us that the current active WG documents are on the track
(with little discussions recently) and no new work was suggested.

So, given this, does the WG think it's worth to meet at IETF 115?
Or probably there are some new proposals for UTA were are not aware of yet?
If you think we should meet, please chime in ASAP, the 23rd is the last date to request a session.

Regards,
Leif & Valery.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email